Roy Harrington wrote: > >Here's a couple of examples of what partitioning looks like for 2, 4, >and 7 grays. >They are crude text graphs but show that at all times there are 2 or 3 >inks being used. >Down the page are the K percents, across is amount of each ink used. > > For the K7 it has even more mixing than I expected. What is the overlap number you use to get the quad result below and for which printer was it used ? Ernst >A quad system: > > 0 0% | > 5 2% | Y > 10 4% | Y > 15 6% | Y > 20 8% | Y > 25 10% | Y > 30 12% | Y > 35 14% | Y > 40 16% | Y > 45 18% | Y > 50 20% | Y > 55 22% | Y > 60 24% | Y > 65 25% | Y > 70 27% | Y > 75 29% |M Y > 80 31% |M Y > 85 33% | M Y > 90 35% | M Y > 95 37% | M Y >100 39% | M Y >105 41% | M Y >110 43% | M Y >115 45% | M Y >120 47% | M Y >125 49% | M Y >130 51% | M Y >135 53% | Y M >140 55% |C Y M >145 57% | C Y M >150 59% | C Y M >155 61% | C Y M >160 63% | C Y M >165 65% | CY M >170 67% | Y C M >175 69% |Y C M >180 71% | C M >185 73% | C M >190 75% | C M >195 76% | C M >200 78% | C M >205 80% | M C >210 82% | M C >215 84% | K M C >220 86% | K M C >225 88% | KM C >230 90% | M K C >235 92% | K C >240 94% | K C >245 96% | K C >250 98% | C K >255 100% | C > K > > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QTR 51-step linearisation2
2005-08-24 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.