I think I understand what I'm seeing here. It reminds one that using more dilutions of black will give one diminishing returns. But, we as a group are all about getting the very best we can out of our printing. This begs the question: How many is too many? People I trust tell me that there's a clearly visible advantage in going from four inks to six. Is there a visible advantage in going from six inks to seven? eight? twelve? -- Bruce Watson Roy Harrington wrote: > Here's a couple of examples of what partitioning looks like for 2, 4, > and 7 grays. > They are crude text graphs but show that at all times there are 2 or 3 > inks being used. > Down the page are the K percents, across is amount of each ink used. > > A quad system: > > 0 0% | > 5 2% | Y > 10 4% | Y > 15 6% | Y > 20 8% | Y > 25 10% | Y > 30 12% | Y > 35 14% | Y > 40 16% | Y > 45 18% | Y > 50 20% | Y > 55 22% | Y > 60 24% | Y > 65 25% | Y > 70 27% | Y > 75 29% |M Y > 80 31% |M Y > 85 33% | M Y > 90 35% | M Y > 95 37% | M Y > 100 39% | M Y > 105 41% | M Y > 110 43% | M Y > 115 45% | M Y > 120 47% | M Y > 125 49% | M Y > 130 51% | M Y > 135 53% | Y M > 140 55% |C Y M > 145 57% | C Y M > 150 59% | C Y M > 155 61% | C Y M > 160 63% | C Y M > 165 65% | CY M > 170 67% | Y C M > 175 69% |Y C M > 180 71% | C M > 185 73% | C M > 190 75% | C M > 195 76% | C M > 200 78% | C M > 205 80% | M C > 210 82% | M C > 215 84% | K M C > 220 86% | K M C > 225 88% | KM C > 230 90% | M K C > 235 92% | K C > 240 94% | K C > 245 96% | K C > 250 98% | C K > 255 100% | C > K > > > Finally the K7 system: > > 0 0% | > 5 2% | Y > 10 4% |m Y > 15 6% | m Y > 20 8% | m Y > 25 10% | m Y > 30 12% | m Y > 35 14% | m Y > 40 16% | Y m > 45 18% | M Y m > 50 20% | M Y m > 55 22% | Y M > m > 60 24% | Y M > m > 65 25% | M m > 70 27% | M m > 75 29% | m M > 80 31% |c m M > 85 33% | c m M > 90 35% | c m M > 95 37% | c m > M > 100 39% | cm > M > 105 41% | m c > M > 110 43% | m c > M > 115 45% | c > M > 120 47% | c M > 125 49% | c M > 130 51% | c M > 135 53% | M c > 140 55% | M c > 145 57% | C M c > 150 59% | C M c > 155 61% | C M c > 160 63% | CM > c > 165 65% | M C > c > 170 67% | C > c > 175 69% | C c > 180 71% | C c > 185 73% | c C > 190 75% |k c C > 195 76% | k c > C > 200 78% | kc > C > 205 80% | c k > C > 210 82% | k C > 215 84% | k C > 220 86% | C k > 225 88% | K C > k > 230 90% | K C > k > 235 92% | CK > k > 240 94% | C K > k > 245 96% | K > k > 250 98% | kK > 255 100% | k > K > > Roy > > - > Roy Harrington > roy@... > Black & White Photo Gallery > http://www.harrington.com >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QTR 51-step linearisation2
2005-08-25 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.