Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] differences between 1440 resolutions

2009-12-25 by mrjimbo

Thanks Jim,
I kind of assumed you were on gloss stock as that was the only one that made sense at 2880.. I'm honestly surprised with the result..

jimbo

 ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Thyer 
  To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 3:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] differences between 1440 resolutions


    
  Jimbo,

  All tests printed on Ilford Galerie Smooth High Gloss media.

  Jim

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mrjimbo 
  To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 2:04 AM
  Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] differences between 1440 resolutions

  Jim ,
  What material did you print the 2880 on?

  Jimbo
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Thyer 
  To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] differences between 1440 resolutions

  David,

  You asked this some time ago, and recently I have printed at all resolutions on my Epson R1800 as a test. This system has 4 options for 1440. Also tried 2880 and 720. Was using speed set to bidirectional for these tests. 

  The 2880 setting came out as though it was through a difusing screen, the sharpness had been lost.

  The 702 came out pale, but similar in quality to 1440 super (see below).

  These could be because the profile I generated (can't imediately track the file to confirm) was set for 1440 dpi.

  Of the other options:

  1440 lines of ink could be clearly seen across the page.

  1440 super these lines could be seen, but less clearly

  1440 x 1440 needed a magnifying lens to see these lines

  1440 x 1440 super even with a reasonably strong lens (10x), picture appeared smooth, no trace of these lines.

  Clearly as a result of this test I will only use the 1440 x 1440 super setting in future. 

  Sorry for the delay in getting this reply, hope it is of some help. Of the three options you mention I would suggest using the super 1440, but recommend printing a test picture using each setting and looking at the results with a magnifying lens. Best option should be clear.

  Jim Thyer

  .
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David 
  To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:46 AM
  Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] differences between 1440 resolutions

  There are, I believe, three 1440 resolutions: 1440, 1440x1440, and super 1440. Can someone tell me what the differences are between these? 

  I read somewhere that 1440 super provides more "weaving" but I'm not sure what that is or what it means. 

  Thanks, David. 

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.118/2584 - Release Date: 12/23/09 19:02:00

  ----------

  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.118/2584 - Release Date: 12/23/09 19:02:00

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2585 - Release Date: 12/24/09 08:11:00

  ----------


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2585 - Release Date: 12/24/09 08:11:00


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.