Hi Parker, > I was using some of your QTR profiles for the Epson Hot Press natural. >I am trying to set up a simple workflow for my studio where I can take the same sRGB or AdobeRGB files that I send to my lab and print them out in the studio. Gray Gamma 2.2 is a subset of those color spaces. At page 11 of http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eb1400.pdf you can see the Gray Gamma 2.2 curve compared to the linear QTR output. Keep in mind that I print with Windows and use QTR as a stand alone printing utility. Since I edit in Gray Gamma 2.2, I have to convert the file for printing with QTR, otherwise the image will look lighter than my monitor. I use a Photoshop image adjustment curve to do this (it's in the zip file). There are other methods, including Roy's ICCs, which are explained in "gray-readme.rtf" file in the "icc" folder of the QTR download. > ... I do a lot of printing through my lab onto an Epson 9800 (I think) and the prints match my monitor quite accurately. (Calibration with Eye One Match.) Where I have the full Eboni-6 in a printer, I most often use an Epson driver workflow with an ICC made with QTR's Create ICC-RGB. This gives me a "color managed" workflow where the print will match the monitor's view of my gray gamma 2.2 files with no need to alter them at all. (It's also a high bit depth pipeline to the printer.) > Basically, I just want a system that makes beautiful prints, where I can do what I do with my Kodak Lustre and Epson Large format (Han Photo Rag) prints, which is get it looking good on my monitor and let it rip. Given that, is the Epson driver the best choice? If you are not familiar with the QTR rip, then I think the ICC workflow is easier. Good luck with the system. It should work very well for you. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Eboni6 vs. UltraChrome
2010-11-25 by Paul
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.