I realize that my first mail was not clear... I took Paul's curve for Photorag to print a reference (linear) and be able to setup my scanner. Then, I created MY curve from scratch for the new paper, and my only problem is the last step: linearization. I hope it's better now :o) Anayway, I already thank you all for your reactivity... Sylvain. Le ven 11/02/11 12:42, "Jim Thyer" jimth@... a écrit: > Sylvain > > Your response suggests you started with a linearised curve. > > I believe that you need to remove the linearization line from Paul's curve, > then create a new one of your own. > If Paul's curve is linearised, then you only replace his linearization with > yours, you need NO linearization at your starting curve. Then add your own > figures. > JIm Thyer > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Sylvain > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 6:23 PM > Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Linearization with a scanner > > > > Yes, it was the linearized curve. I wanted to get a linear printed strip > (as a reference). > Sylvain. > > Le jeu 10/02/11 23:38, "Jim Thyer" jimth@n > etspace.net.au a écrit: > Sylvain, > > > > Simple question, > > > > In step 1 you used Paul's curve, did it still contain his > linearisation > figures? > > Otherwise you have introduced a new linearization, not corrected > it. > > > Jim Thyer > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Sylvain > > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 7:33 AM > > Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Linearization with a scanner > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been printing with paul's curves on Photorag for a whil now, and > I'm > trying new papers. Since I do not have any spectro, I tried to > linearize my > profile with my Epson V500 scanner. > I did it this way: > > 1. Printed a 21 step strip on Photorag with Paul's curve, let it > dry. > 2. Scanned it (tif, gray levels) > > 3. adjusted the picture (with Gimp) to get the white square at 100% > and the > black one at 0% > 4. adjusted the gamma (1.3), to have all squares (or nearly) at their > > normal value (100-95-90-85-...) > 5. Printed same strip on new paper with non linearized curve, let it > > dry. > 6. scanned it with same parameters as 2. > > 7. adjusted it: black, white, and gamma to 1.3 > > I got the following values: > > 100-96-90-84-79-72-65-62-60-53-47-45-40-34-27-23-21-19-15-9-0 > 8. I put the values in QTR for linearization. > > 9. Printed a new strip to check. Bad result. Seems to be too much > > corrected. > > Question: what did I miss? > > > > Help! > > > > Thx :o) > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Individual Email | Traditional > > > > > QuadtoneRIP-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > Individual Email | Traditional > > QuadtoneRIP-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Linearization with a scanner
2011-02-11 by Sylvain
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.