To clarify my use of inks, I find MIS carbons -- Eboni and PK, LK, LLK -- to be excellent. I'm a B&W guy, so color inks are relevant only to the extent they are used with the carbon inks. In my comparative fade testing, the MIS blended carbon + color inksets did about the same as the Peizo samples I tested with them. I switched to OEM Lm in my 7500 some years ago. See http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/4K+.pdf But for most casual B&W, the third party B&W blended inks are good enough, and MIS B&W inks are a good value. I think they can fill important gaps in the market. For my fine art and museum work, I obviously prefer 100% carbon. After that, for fine art, I prefer HP Z3100 Pk as a pigment for neutral glossy and very neutral to cool matte prints on almost all popular papers. The HP PK dilution with MIS glop to stop bronzing is particularly interesting. But the ability to buy OEM Z3100 gray and light gray provides us with an OEM ink solution for neutral monotone B&W that sets a baseline for all the others, in my view. So far, they've run well in the Epson's I've used them in. Paul www.PaulRoark.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: OT? MIS PK vs. Epson PK
2011-05-26 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.