Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

Which Printer

Which Printer

2015-10-20 by gregnixon@...

I have two Epson 13" printers. The idea was too have a dedicated colour printer and a dedicated Quad tone printer. I have been using an Epson 1410 (1400in the US) as the Quad printer and a 2100 (2200 in the US) as the colour printer.


Both printers work and I have fitted both quad inks and colour inks in the 1400, but I have only colour ink for the 2100

I like the 2100 for its pigments inks. The driver lacks some of the paper profiles, the 1410 caters for more paper profiles.

So I have to buy more QuadTone inks. Has any got any compelling reasons for choosing one printer over the other?

Cheers

Greg

Re: Which Printer

2015-10-21 by brian_downunda@...

It's not clear which inkset you're using when you say "quadtone". I've owned both printers, and still have fond memories of the 2100. I thought the build quality of the 1410 was poor. I had them set up much as you do. The advantage of using the 2100 for colour is that you get LK as well as PK/MK, unlike the 1410. Also, if you're using OEM, the 1410 is dye, not pigment. I can't see the value of putting a monochrome inkset into the 2100, unless you want to use K7, in which case I'd strongly encourage you to use K6 in the 1410, as shade 7 adds very little IMHO.

What inkset are you using and what papers are you missing profiles / curves for?

Re: Which Printer

2015-10-23 by gregnixon@...

Hi Brian and thanks for your reply.

I had a 2000P which I could never get a decent colour print from except when using Epson Archival Matte. So If I can't get a decent colour print, I reasoned, that I should convert It to a B&W printer. That worked reasonably well until one of the colour tanks leaked badly and sent ink into the print carriage electronics. That was the end of that printer. The inks that I purchased for that were MIS UT4FSN-4-C,Y, M, K, LM, LC

I thought the second generation pigment printer ie. the 2100 would have to be better

It should have been better, except there was no canned colour profiles for the paper that I had, There is in the paper selection, Plain, Archival Matte, Premium Semigloss, Glossy Paper Photo Weight, Watercolor Paper. I had Archival Matte, Premium Glossy Photo Paper and Glossy Photo Paper. I could match the Archival Matte profile but where were the profiles for the other two.

At the same time I got a good deal on the 1410 and planned to use that for B&W printer. I used the inks that I got the 2000P in the 1410. That sort of worked, but I wondered I that ink was ok for it.

I needed to print some colour the other day, the 2100 wasn't working, so I put a new set of colour carts into the 1410 and it worked well, most of the paper profiles except for Glossy Photo Paper are there.

Now I have a working colour printer and a 2100 colour printer.

Back to the original question, which of the two colour printers to convert to B&W, preferably using the inks that I have.

Cheers

Greg


---In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, <brian_downunda@...> wrote :

It's not clear which inkset you're using when you say "quadtone". I've owned both printers, and still have fond memories of the 2100. I thought the build quality of the 1410 was poor. I had them set up much as you do. The advantage of using the 2100 for colour is that you get LK as well as PK/MK, unlike the 1410. Also, if you're using OEM, the 1410 is dye, not pigment. I can't see the value of putting a monochrome inkset into the 2100, unless you want to use K7, in which case I'd strongly encourage you to use K6 in the 1410, as shade 7 adds very little IMHO.

What inkset are you using and what papers are you missing profiles / curves for?

Re: Which Printer

2015-10-23 by brian_downunda@...

I'm not sure what I can add to my previous post. To be honest, I don't like your chances of converting the 2100 to B&W. It's my experience that as a printer ages, it's harder and harder to get a printer to work with refillable cartridges, even though it may still work with OEM. At some point even OEM becomes a struggle. This was certainly the case with my 2100. It's not clear which you're currently using, but in either case I suspect that you'd struggle to do any better with the B&W inkset in refillables. The 2100 is an old printer, and I congratulate you for keeping it going this long.

If you can get it working for colour, perhaps with OEM, then you can get Epson profiles for the 2100/2200 here:
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/EditorialAnnouncement.jsp?oid=42114986

Note that Epson have a strange habit of changing the names of some of their papers. For example Archival Matte was renamed Enhanced Matte in the US, but not elsewhere, and has now been renamed Ultra Premium Presentation Paper Matte Paper (I think). I'd use Premium Glossy for regular Glossy, or you could pay someone to make just one profile. To use these profiles, you'd need to turn on colour management in the Epson driver and print from Photoshop or some other program that uses colour management.


If you can't get it working, and you want to have both a colour and a B&W printer, then I think you're going to need a new colour printer. I think the 1410 is the best option for a dedicated B&W inkset. It's one of the last printers that has carts on the print head, rather than ink lines and dampers, and so is easier to maintain. The 1410 seems to suffer far less from the issue of micro-banding in the first and last inch when printing with QTR that plagues most other desktop printers. So my advice is to keep it going for as long as you can as a B&W printer, try to resuscitate the 2100 for colour, and if you can't then buy something else.


---In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, <gregnixon@...> wrote :

I thought the second generation pigment printer ie. the 2100 would have to be better

It should have been better, except there was no canned colour profiles for the paper that I had, There is in the paper selection, Plain, Archival Matte, Premium Semigloss, Glossy Paper Photo Weight, Watercolor Paper. I had Archival Matte, Premium Glossy Photo Paper and Glossy Photo Paper. I could match the Archival Matte profile but where were the profiles for the other two.

At the same time I got a good deal on the 1410 and planned to use that for B&W printer. I used the inks that I got the 2000P in the 1410. That sort of worked, but I wondered I that ink was ok for it.

I needed to print some colour the other day, the 2100 wasn't working, so I put a new set of colour carts into the 1410 and it worked well, most of the paper profiles except for Glossy Photo Paper are there.

Now I have a working colour printer and a 2100 colour printer.

Back to the original question, which of the two colour printers to convert to B&W, preferably using the inks that I have.


Re: Which Printer

2015-10-24 by gregnixon@...

Thanks again for your advice. I have seen that site for .icc profiles, but after you run the setup.exe within the zip file, where do the icc profiles goto. No idea.

Cheers

Greg

Re: Which Printer

2015-10-25 by brian_downunda@...

The .exe file is a self-extracting zip file. It unpacks some setup files into a nominated location, the default for which on my PC is c:\epson\epsonxxxx_yyyyy. It may then run the unzipped setup file automatically, or you many need to locate it and execute it yourself. The setup file should place the profiles in C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color and they will be named something like SPR2880 PrmSmGls Photo.icc . You should see them next time you start Photoshop, or whatever you're using. It's more complex that simply placing ICC files in that folder yourself, but it works for me.

Re: Which Printer

2015-10-26 by gregnixon@...

I checked that location and didn't see any 2100 profiles. I did re-run that exe and the paper I chose has the 2200 Velvet profiles in that location. Also I found this site http://esupport.epson-europe.com/FileDetails.aspx?lng=en-GB&data=FGQ8MBMpKluiu6U002FIrRBMu0e0L35VzoWd&id=18290

Which had the 2100 profiles. I downloaded and Installed them.

Of course the soft proofing is different between the 1420 and the 2100, but I'll have to wait till the computer shop gets the LC and LM carts into stock, then I'll print and see whether it approximates the proof.

Thanks again. I'll keep you up to date

Greg

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.