-----Original Message----- From: OWEN DEVIVO [mailto:ODeVivo@...] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 8:47 PM To: 'analogue@...' Subject: RE: [AH] MKS-80, Jupiter8, Virus: Are they apples and oranges? MKS-80 vs. Virus.......... heh, somewhat apples and oranges, unless you'll use the Virus for ONLY a synth (never using the fx, multiouts or inputs...) The Virus hands down. Not too mention the wide scope of capabilities the Virus has. The Virus is a more modern tool as well.... yup, that's my thought, Owen the soyboy -----Original Message----- From: Royce Lee [SMTP:rlee@...] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 12:13 PM To: analogue@... Subject: [AH] MKS-80, Jupiter8, Virus: Are they apples and oranges? I know this may seem like a tired issue, and it was to me until I came up with around 800$ and started to think about which synths to buy. Does anybody own both an MKS-80 and a Virus? What are there relative strengths and weaknesses? If you only had the money for one, which would you go for. . .or rather, which would you go for first? I've heard some people complain about slow envelopes on the MKS-80 and sloppy sequencing. If that was that, I wouldn't even consider it further, but I know these kinds of complaints are often related to computer, interface timing problems. Any input would be appreciated. -royce
Message
FW: [AH] MKS-80, Jupiter8, Virus: Are they apples and oranges?
2000-04-03 by Verschut, Ricardo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.