Yahoo Groups archive

All about the Roland Jupiter-series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:13 UTC

Message

FW: [AH] MKS-80 Thoughts

2000-04-10 by Verschut, Ricardo

-----Original Message-----
From: N. Kent [mailto:ndkent@...] 
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 12:16 PM
To: analogue@...; inform3r@...
Subject: [AH] MKS-80 Thoughts


>    Hey there,
> 
>     I got an MKS-80 about a week ago and I've finally had a little time to
> get serious with it. I must say that the synth is incredible! 

I think its just great in comparison to a lot of things. Soundwise
theres the differences between the Curtis and Roland chip versions, so
that complicates things a little in comparing its sound.

I bought one about 5 years ago (Roland chip) thinking it would cover the
big polysynth area, and I found, while it was good at the straight
sounds I soon bought a Memorymoog because of all the sonic areas it
couldn't be pushed into (the more extremes, resonant based filter
sounds, never found that bottom end suitible for what I was looking for,
etc.) Still the SYSEX for every parameter and velocity is a rarity in
real analog polysynths. I eventually found I could pretty much cover the
MKS-80 sound with a Voyetra Eight, so I intended to sell it, though I
never got around to doing it. Now I'm a little annoyed that the price is
coming down on MKS-80s. Still its nice to have something poly with SYSEX
on every parameter.

Prior to
> buying it I was use to reading one user review say that it's great and the
> next one would claim that it sucks and it's over-priced.

well overpriced if you will only settle for under $500 synths or wonder
why a MKS-70 goes for $300. I mean look what VAs generally go for.

 I think the latter
> remark is made by people that haven't taken the time to edit it. Once you
> press a couple of buttons and scroll through the parameters this baby
reall=
> y
> opens up!

I should hope so!

> I've even gotten a pretty close Mini bass!(dont flame me! :)

nah, I don't think it comes close, some kind of analog bass, sure.

 I
> haven't even used it in conjunction with the MPG-80 yet, I am planning to
> use it with Unisyn though(editor for Digital Performer).
>     I'm writing this letter to see if there are any MKS-80 users with
> similar feelings. I was also curious if anyone out there is already using
i=
> t
> with Unisyn. Also, does anyone have any cool patches??

I'm using a Doepfer Drehbank which works out since there is just the
right amount of knobs to do all the parameters. (had to sit there a day
and input all the sysex, but since I did it before for the PC-1600, I
just copied, I didn't like that I had to do 3 pages worth on the PC-1600).

The one thing nice about the computer editors is in most cases you can
see every parameter value in one view.

nicholas kent

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.