-----Original Message----- From: ModularMoog [mailto:modularmoog@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:53 AM To: Kelly; analogue@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [AH] WAS: [AH] JP-8 and more NOW: OPINION on 30/01/01 08:57, Kelly at controlvoltage@... wrote: > ***CAUTION, WARNING, the following contains unadulterated OPINION*** > > heh heh heh.. so true. The mask of effects sure can hide the truth of VA, > thats why most have it built in. I was playing an MS-2000 at the music > store recently and, although I was only on it for about 15 minutes, I could > not even see how it was possible to turn the effects off. It certainly This is ignorant, I don´t know about the MS2000 and effects but there most certainly is _not_ much effects with i.ex the Virus synth and certainly not the way you describe... it´s a "regular" delay and chorus which you can easily turn off... does nothing more good/worse to a sound than outboard delay/chorus effects does to your analog beats. > wasn't right up front. I've had a few pints this eve, so I'll go ahead and > say what I really mean: I started buying analog because it was easy to use > and I loved the sound, its unique. Its SO good in fact, thats why virtual > analogs even exist, if you love your _ _ _ _ (<---insert VA here) you gotta > thank Bob. Analog is my favorite sound (if you haven't guessed). Digital Well guess we need to than mr Einstein first then?.... seriously... What did Moog/Roland/ARP/name-a-company do in the 70/80´s ??? they copied and stole ideas from each other all the time.... what direction did they go?... None of the companies stayed in the analog domain... digital where the results. Don´t get me wrong because I truely love analog synths but the VA´s do compete these day´s. > does not cut it, not even close. I found the MS-2000 "interesting, looks > good, blah blah" </niceties> lame. I am biased though, I appreciate the > vibrant, rich, full, lively, animated, colourful tones that only analog can Only Analog can do?... go check out a few of the more known VA´s today and I´m sure you will agree that (no matter if interface sux) you will go back on that opinion. > provide... my mind is open but there is nothing out there to match it. I > think picking on "virtual analog" is fair game. Nobody analog made a > virtual digital. (pre-emptive strike: hybrid never tried to imitate the > sound of digital, just the ease of use/stability). The beauty of the whole > "some day they will get digital to be as good" argument is that 'someday' it > might be 'as good', but as an imitation, it can never exceed the original, I don´t agree... I think a few VA´s allready does things better than the analogs (in the same class that is). > Thanks. This may not have been the most diplomatic announcement, but I > just felt like singing the praises at this very moment, and you people were > the ones to whom it may concern, THANKS!!! W00T! :-O Regards. Henning.
Message
FW: [AH] WAS: [AH] JP-8 and more NOW: OPINION
2001-01-30 by Verschut, Ricardo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.