-----Original Message----- From: Jon O'Donnell [mailto:gods.own.prototype@...] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:12 AM To: Kelly Cc: analogue@... Subject: Re: [AH] WAS: [AH] JP-8 and more NOW: OPINION I have to agree kelly even though analog is da shiznit. I still like VA and D*g*t*l. But I except them on there own basis. I would never buy a insturment to mimick something else EG another synthesis format or a guitar if you want a guitar sounds then buy a guitar if you want analog synth sounds then buy them not VA. I my get my ass verbally kicked for this but some of the d*g*t*l and VA stuff sounds good. Take the waldorf microwave, the roland D-50,yamaha DX-7,access virus. All have there strong points in music composition. But I will never ever buy something that says groove on the case or is the name sake of past synths. "F**K D*G*t*l the world belongs to the analog loyalist"<--- (saw it on a T-Shirt Cool eh) Kelly wrote: > > > > Bring your JP-8 to a friend with i.ex the Virus TDM plug-in and play > them > > > side by side... I think you´re about to experience a minor shock!. > > > > yeah cut back the layers of fx and you will be in even more of a shock! > > ***CAUTION, WARNING, the following contains unadulterated OPINION*** > > heh heh heh.. so true. The mask of effects sure can hide the truth of VA, > thats why most have it built in. I was playing an MS-2000 at the music > store recently and, although I was only on it for about 15 minutes, I could > not even see how it was possible to turn the effects off. It certainly > wasn't right up front. I've had a few pints this eve, so I'll go ahead and > say what I really mean: I started buying analog because it was easy to use > and I loved the sound, its unique. Its SO good in fact, thats why virtual > analogs even exist, if you love your _ _ _ _ (<---insert VA here) you gotta > thank Bob. Analog is my favorite sound (if you haven't guessed). Digital > does not cut it, not even close. I found the MS-2000 "interesting, looks > good, blah blah" </niceties> lame. I am biased though, I appreciate the > vibrant, rich, full, lively, animated, colourful tones that only analog can > provide... my mind is open but there is nothing out there to match it. I > think picking on "virtual analog" is fair game. Nobody analog made a > virtual digital. (pre-emptive strike: hybrid never tried to imitate the > sound of digital, just the ease of use/stability). The beauty of the whole > "some day they will get digital to be as good" argument is that 'someday' it > might be 'as good', but as an imitation, it can never exceed the original, > the standard by which it measures itself. If it ever got so good that > nobody even wanted an analog synth, then they would have to call it.... > WHAT WOULD THEY CALL IT??? (hey, if theres something better than anlog, I'm > alllll ears, the same ears that tell me the opinion your reading now by the > way :-) In the mean time, I'll just hang on to my appreciating, and > appreciated analog boards, the great inspiration of my creativity. And my > DX-7, what the heck. For all of you who thought a 2600 was too expensive at > $1400US 4 years ago, you should have caved in then. Hey, now that they're > 2400+ you still might be getting a bargain by 2005 standards. Better hop > on-board now! I'll bet the Nord 5 still won't match its sonics. hee hee > hee... > > Thanks. This may not have been the most diplomatic announcement, but I > just felt like singing the praises at this very moment, and you people were > the ones to whom it may concern, THANKS!!! W00T! > > * .,:3Õ3*+ . > + ,d$$P`. . > . j$$$X > .p$$+-. .$$$$ . `+ + > '$$s i$$$s ^b. > i$$$ '?$dx, `$b. . > Y$& . + $$m l$$; > -+$. $ '+,$$bY$$$' > ~ontrol' `i$oltage > ':' `Y$$/ . > ' `% > K e l l y . " > > www.mp3.com/controlvoltage > >
Message
FW: [AH] WAS: [AH] JP-8 and more NOW: OPINION
2001-02-01 by Verschut, Ricardo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.