Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:24:48 -0800 (PST) To: Andy Worlock <synthtrader@...> From: Neil Bradley <nb@...> cc: <analogue@...> Subject: Re: [AH] Re: Jupiter 6 still sucks for pads Message-ID: <20021113101910.T8531-100000@...> > In the last digest, Neil quoted me as not liking the > Jup-8. That couldn't be further from the truth as its > my favorite polysynth, mainly because of the pads and > "synth strings". Well, as you stated, I *DID* quote you. ;-) > Now a Jup6 with a Europe design looks like a killer > polysynth...until you play it. No offense to Neil, the > Europa adds some killer specs and was definitely a > labour of love, but the interface is cumbersome and I > just wouldn't waste my time with a Jup-6 regardless. Have you actually used a JP-6 with Europa's interface? I'm not talking about looking at the manual - I mean actually played/used it? Andy, this is crossing over to axe grinding. Can you please stop with the JP-6 dissent? We all are PAINFULLY aware you don't like the JP-6. You've expressed that opinion clearly. So why continue to post such things? Everyone so far has disagreed with you. Am I not correct in thinking that there is nothing left to be said on the topic? -->Neil
Message
Re: [AH] Re: Jupiter 6 still sucks for pads
2002-11-19 by Verschut, Ricardo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.