Yahoo Groups archive

All about the Roland Jupiter-series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:13 UTC

Thread

Jupiter-8 differences ?

Jupiter-8 differences ?

2003-10-09 by Verschut, Ricardo

Date: Wed,  8 Oct 2003 18:46:52 +0200
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: lasse@...
Subject: Jupiter-8 differences ?

Hi,

I'm considering buying an early serialnumber JP-8 ( around 140000 ). It's a =
12-bit version with no DCB. I'm not sure of the O/S version.

As I understand it, the main reason for the switch to the 14-bit processor =
was increased tuning stability.

Does anyone have experience with both versions and can give some insight to =
if there's any noticable difference in "fatness" ?

The seller wants premium bucks for this one, around 2200Euro, but as it is =
not mint, doesn't have Midi  and  doesn't come with a case ( needs to be =
shipped 1000km ) it seems a bit steep. I figure, it is only worth half of =
what the seller wants........

Maybe I should look to other vintage synths as I have a number of Rolands =
already, but damn it's one sexy machine !

LJ

Re: [Roland_Jupiters] Jupiter-8 differences ?

2003-10-09 by the bronze medallion

hi LJ

i have the 12-bit version and have not experienced any
problem/instability with tuning. anyway, it is very
easy to tune these synths by pressing the tune button
- which takes about 3 seconds. mine is a 130000 serial
numbered one.

the sound from a jupiter 8 is unbelievable. you wont
regret getting one - they are worth every penny. i
spent a fortune on mine too.

i have not used a 14-bit version so i cant compare. i
dont believe they would be fatter in any way but, i
could be wrong. how do you get any fatter?

the one i have has midi retrofit and a flight case. i
may consider selling it as i have run out of room in
my home studio. would you be interested?

i live in australia though which may be a problem when
it comes to cost of shipping.

hmm. do i really want to part with my beloved jupiter
8?

mike.

 --- "Verschut, Ricardo"
<ricardo.verschut@...> wrote: > Date: Wed, 
8 Oct 2003 18:46:52 +0200
> From: lasse@...
> Subject: Jupiter-8 differences ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm considering buying an early serialnumber JP-8 (
> around 140000 ). It's a =
> 12-bit version with no DCB. I'm not sure of the O/S
> version.
> 
> As I understand it, the main reason for the switch
> to the 14-bit processor =
> was increased tuning stability.
> 
> Does anyone have experience with both versions and
> can give some insight to =
> if there's any noticable difference in "fatness" ?
> 
> The seller wants premium bucks for this one, around
> 2200Euro, but as it is =
> not mint, doesn't have Midi  and  doesn't come with
> a case ( needs to be =
> shipped 1000km ) it seems a bit steep. I figure, it
> is only worth half of =
> what the seller wants........
> 
> Maybe I should look to other vintage synths as I
> have a number of Rolands =
> already, but damn it's one sexy machine !
> 
> LJ
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> [Jura Music Productions]
> [The Jura Plant] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>  

http://search.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Search
- Looking for more? Try the new Yahoo! Search

Re: Jupiter-8 differences ?

2003-10-09 by zipper_uk32

> I'm considering buying an early serialnumber JP-8 ( around 
140000 ). It's a 12-bit version with no DCB. I'm not sure of the O/S 
version.
> 
Sounds very close to the one I own, the OS version is probably 1.2
You could update this to the the latest version if you want moveable 
split point, and consider adding the encore midi retrofit.


> As I understand it, the main reason for the switch to the 14-bit 
processor was increased tuning stability.
 
This is good and bad. Sure the tuning drifts and I need to remember 
to hit autotune every now and again. The amount of heat the JP8 
generates doesn't help. 

14bit machines had a revised processor board fitted. The increase in 
stability = decrease in fatness. 'Fatness' wasn't a good selling 
point in 1983, so 14bit tuning makes the voices less likely to drift 
and its this slight drift that creates the fatness.

> Does anyone have experience with both versions and can give some 
insight to if there's any noticable difference in "fatness" ?

It depends on your point of reference. If you are used to working 
with modern synths I doubt you will tell the difference. To be honest 
I don't think 2 JP8s actually sound identical anyway. I've played 
later ones and they definately sound differnt to my ears, but put me 
in a blind test and I'm not sure I could tell once its in a mix. 


> The seller wants premium bucks for this one, around 2200Euro, but 

I'd say a fair price is probably around 1600-1800 Euro, they 
certainly sell in the UK for between 800-1250 UK pounds

> Maybe I should look to other vintage synths as I have a number of 
Rolands  already, but damn it's one sexy machine !

JP8 would be the last possesion I would part with, I've got plenty of 
analogs in my collection and a good number are Roland - it has a very 
distinctive sound, and if anything it can be too big sometimes.

Hope this helps

Stuart

Re: [Roland_Jupiters] Jupiter-8 differences ?

2003-10-10 by J. Landman

If the bronze medallion would consider selling his jp8, i would be interested. Please mail me at jlandman@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Roland_Jupiters] Jupiter-8 differences ?

hi LJ

i have the 12-bit version and have not experienced any
problem/instability with tuning. anyway, it is very
easy to tune these synths by pressing the tune button
- which takes about 3 seconds. mine is a 130000 serial
numbered one.

the sound from a jupiter 8 is unbelievable. you wont
regret getting one - they are worth every penny. i
spent a fortune on mine too.

i have not used a 14-bit version so i cant compare. i
dont believe they would be fatter in any way but, i
could be wrong. how do you get any fatter?

the one i have has midi retrofit and a flight case. i
may consider selling it as i have run out of room in
my home studio. would you be interested?

i live in australia though which may be a problem when
it comes to cost of shipping.

hmm. do i really want to part with my beloved jupiter
8?

mike.

--- "Verschut, Ricardo"
wrote: > Date: Wed,
8 Oct 2003 18:46:52 +0200
> From: lasse@...
> Subject: Jupiter-8 differences ?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering buying an early serialnumber JP-8 (
> around 140000 ). It's a =
> 12-bit version with no DCB. I'm not sure of the O/S
> version.
>
> As I understand it, the main reason for the switch
> to the 14-bit processor =
> was increased tuning stability.
>
> Does anyone have experience with both versions and
> can give some insight to =
> if there's any noticable difference in "fatness" ?
>
> The seller wants premium bucks for this one, around
> 2200Euro, but as it is =
> not mint, doesn't have Midi ; and doesn't come with
> a case ( needs to be =
> shipped 1000km ) it seems a bit steep. I figure, it
> is only worth half of =
> what the seller wants........
>
> Maybe I should look to other vintage synths as I
> have a number of Rolands =
> already, but damn it's one sexy machine !
>
>; LJ
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> [Jura Music Productions]
> [The Jura Plant]
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

http://search.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Search
- Looking for more? Try the new Yahoo! Search


[Jura Music Productions]
[The Jura Plant]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.