I would not rule out at least one NTO in your system. Keep in mind what
else you're getting beyond a PCO: VC Waveshape, VC Portamento, VC Dynamic
Depth FM. That's a lot of functionality in one extra module space.
John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
else you're getting beyond a PCO: VC Waveshape, VC Portamento, VC Dynamic
Depth FM. That's a lot of functionality in one extra module space.
John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cuari7 [mailto:medejd@...]
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 6:04 PM
> To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [SergeModular] Re: Serge Lust.
>
> I'm partial to PCO's + Dual Comparators instead of NTO's. The PWM
> effect from the variable wave is not as rich as the PCO/COMP combo,
> IMO. Plus, you only take up 5 one-inch spaces with 2 PCO's + one
> Dual Comp. vs 2 NTO's.
> I love BOTH the Waveshaper and Wave Multiplier. They both hae very
> distinctive sounds. The advantge of the Wave Mult is that, indeed,
> the effect is more "intense", plus the upper section can double as
> an extra VCA if so desired.
> Not a bad idea 'bout 2 filters, as the combination of 2 or more BP
> filters is excellent for vocal-formant synthesis.
> How about a ring modulator?
>
> cuari
>