Serge sounds are as good as their programmer.
A good programmer with a good understanding of synthesis can make all the sounds
you describe, but do you really need a complex modular to make the sounds you
want to create?
There are better synths for a first modular because
the Serge, especially the older ones which may lack labelling, can be confusing
to the unfamliar.
What are the specs on the system you're getting and
what's the price? When will you be getting it?
----- Original Message -----From: hal3001Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 12:11 PMSubject: [SergeModular] Re: Digest Number 708ahh, some nice replies. A lot of people talk about the newer serges
though.
the serge i'm going to be getting is from 1972, and it seems those
panels are a little older, and not as versatile as the newer ones?
and also not as reliable?
I'm still going to pick up one, even if the oscs don't track
1v/oct, It's really my first modular, i've owned semi modulars, but
never a full modular. It seems that people are obsessed over
serges. Maybe it's something non quantifiable? :-)
I don't make bug music, i'm basically looking for crazy orgaic
growls, drones, a good lead, maybe a good bass? I think i'm going ot
be adding a few newer oscs to the system, non serge for the 1v/oct
hmm...
-ryan
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "cuari7" <medejd@t...> wrote:
> The appeal of it? It's flexibility. Its SOUNDS combines the
exuberant
> weirdness of nonconventional "bug" music-making machines with the
> sharp precission and stability of new generation machines. I have
> tried FM on different brands of neo-modulars (MOTM, dotcom and
> Dopefer) but none give me the rich sounds that I get from my Serge!
> Oh, and the filters...! Plus the multifunctionality of some of its
> modules (like the DTG's, giving you VC-complex EG's, LFO's, VCO's,
> filters, lag processors, pulse generators, etc...).
> I recommend you review the "Wizardry" section on Egres. You'll
fall
> in love with it!
> cuari7
Keep on Patchin'!