SergeModular

I missed the first question - what is it again that these patches are doing?

Bob Hearn wrote:

>
> OK, I was able to do that... but it took me a fair number of modules.
> Maybe there's a simpler way?
>
> The first problem is, except for the TKB, you don't have stage-select
> outputs, so you have to arrange to get that signal somehow. I chained
> my TKB to a 4-stage programmer. I used the stage select output (#16)
> from the TKB, and I used row B of the programmer to get the equivalent:
> set all the B knobs but stage 4 full left, and stage 4 full right. Then
> the B output is effectively the stage select out.
>
> Now, hooking them together... start with the ASR toggle flip-flop patch
> from my last post. That's going to control which sequencer is running.
> Now patch:
>
> --------
>
> ASR output 1 -> ACPR vc xfade
> seq. 1 A output -> ACPR in 1
> seq. 2 A output -> ACPR in 2
> ACPR out -> output signal
>
> ASR output 1 -> seq. 1 hold
> ASR output 2 -> seq. 2 hold
>
> seq. 1 stage-select out -> DTG #1 trig in (set rise full right, fall
> almost full-right)
> seq. 2 stage-select out -> DTG #2 trig in (set rise full right, fall
> almost full-right)
>
> DTG #1 output -> OR in A
> DTG #2 output -> OR in B
> OR out -> ASR pulse in
>
> overall clock -> seq. 1 clock & seq. 2 clock
>
> --------
>
> The DTGs (or DSGs) are used to turn the stage-select out gates into
> pulses. (Otherwise one is always on, and the OR output stays high, and
> doesn't generate pulses.) Any other way you want to turn gates into
> pulses will also work fine. Also, you could just use a processor
> instead of the OR to add the pulse signals.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, darkstr1746@c... wrote:
>> strange that you should mention the ASR because when i woke up this
> morning it came to me that this might be a way to get that "set, reset"
> thing going on. But i didn't know how to go about it even though i
> spent some time working on it in my head. I won't have time to get to
> the machine till next wee 'cause of daughters school activities this
> weekend.But it would seem to me the ASR approach would be the simplest.
> Along these same lines, instead of , or along with useing Row A and Row
> B to double the length of the sequencer, how about running two in
> serial? Last stage "gate out" of first Seq starts the second
> sequencer. But how to "hold" the first while the second runs, and then
> "reset" and "hold"the second while the first one is "reset" and started
> again. I'v been thinking on this for months and haven't been able to
> execute the procedure. Anyone?
>> kind regards
>> john duval
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Robert A. Hearn
> http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bob/
>
>
>
>
> Keep on Patchin'!
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>