well john my thinking was to use maybe 3 or 4 or 5 vcfq's. When I use
the res I don't think I really use all 10 bands in any given
application..... say, I want to roll off some highs and give a bass
boost with a weird hump in the midrange. If I had 3 vcfq's I could do
that. So with 5 vcfq's we're talking one mix2 module. Not so bad.
Sure, you could use 8 but I don't know if you could really *perceive*
all that spectral mangulation going on with most waveforms. Maybe in a
few applications, but I have a hard time imagining it. ????
darkstr1746@... wrote:
the res I don't think I really use all 10 bands in any given
application..... say, I want to roll off some highs and give a bass
boost with a weird hump in the midrange. If I had 3 vcfq's I could do
that. So with 5 vcfq's we're talking one mix2 module. Not so bad.
Sure, you could use 8 but I don't know if you could really *perceive*
all that spectral mangulation going on with most waveforms. Maybe in a
few applications, but I have a hard time imagining it. ????
darkstr1746@... wrote:
> So you have a panel of nothing but VCFQX (8) to replicate the ResEQ.
> How are you going to mix all of that? Multiple MIX2s? The beauty of
> the EQ with VC of each segment is that you only have to deal with one
> output. The "mixing" as it were is done within the module itself.
> However, that said, if you had enough mixing power and XFADers, you
> could have a veritable field day throwing the individual outputs of
> eight VCFQXs around the stereo spectrum...... even better with quad.
> kind regards
> john duval