The current design has a mixer in it with the inverting attentuator.
All you need to do is stick a patchcord from an output to the 'IN 2'
input and fiddle and diddle.
On your 2nd point, mixing in different phases... I think I tried this
and the results were more subltle than spectacular. But I'll try it
again unless someone out there beats me to it.
vtl5c3 wrote:
m/n/m/l
surreal electronic music, sound, noise
http://www.mnmlnoise.com
All you need to do is stick a patchcord from an output to the 'IN 2'
input and fiddle and diddle.
On your 2nd point, mixing in different phases... I think I tried this
and the results were more subltle than spectacular. But I'll try it
again unless someone out there beats me to it.
vtl5c3 wrote:
>Hi,--
>
>I don't have a serge phase shifter, but I was re-reading its description the other night in the
>STS catalog and have been contemplating this:
>
>Since it has no fixed resonance control, and requires a mixer to feed a signal back in, what
>happens if you mix multiple outputs (say 360 degrees and 720) back in simultaneously? Is
>there a sonic difference than if only the higher output (720) is fed back in?
>
>Romeo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Keep on Patchin'!
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
m/n/m/l
surreal electronic music, sound, noise
http://www.mnmlnoise.com