the 'mix' knob is actually a wet/dry mix, but the other bit about
putting a patchcord into 'IN 2' is right.
I tried sending the 3 phaser outputs into a Dual Processor (which has
inverting attenuator) and sending that into 'IN 2' -- there is some
interesting variety you get when you mix the various outputs together
and try inversions.
John P wrote:
m/n/m/l
surreal electronic music, sound, noise
http://www.mnmlnoise.com
putting a patchcord into 'IN 2' is right.
I tried sending the 3 phaser outputs into a Dual Processor (which has
inverting attenuator) and sending that into 'IN 2' -- there is some
interesting variety you get when you mix the various outputs together
and try inversions.
John P wrote:
>The current design has a mixer in it with the inverting attentuator.--
>All you need to do is stick a patchcord from an output to the 'IN 2'
>input and fiddle and diddle.
>
>On your 2nd point, mixing in different phases... I think I tried this
>and the results were more subltle than spectacular. But I'll try it
>again unless someone out there beats me to it.
>
>vtl5c3 wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I don't have a serge phase shifter, but I was re-reading its description the other night in the
>>STS catalog and have been contemplating this:
>>
>>Since it has no fixed resonance control, and requires a mixer to feed a signal back in, what
>>happens if you mix multiple outputs (say 360 degrees and 720) back in simultaneously? Is
>>there a sonic difference than if only the higher output (720) is fed back in?
>>
>>Romeo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Keep on Patchin'!
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
m/n/m/l
surreal electronic music, sound, noise
http://www.mnmlnoise.com