Hi John,
Thank you very much for taking the time to try that out! Now to get my hands on
a Serge phaser so I can do my own experiments!
Romeo
Quoting John P <johnp299792@...>:
Thank you very much for taking the time to try that out! Now to get my hands on
a Serge phaser so I can do my own experiments!
Romeo
Quoting John P <johnp299792@...>:
> the 'mix' knob is actually a wet/dry mix, but the other bit about
> putting a patchcord into 'IN 2' is right.
>
> I tried sending the 3 phaser outputs into a Dual Processor (which has
> inverting attenuator) and sending that into 'IN 2' -- there is some
> interesting variety you get when you mix the various outputs together
> and try inversions.
>
> John P wrote:
>
> >The current design has a mixer in it with the inverting attentuator.
> >All you need to do is stick a patchcord from an output to the 'IN 2'
> >input and fiddle and diddle.
> >
> >On your 2nd point, mixing in different phases... I think I tried this
> >and the results were more subltle than spectacular. But I'll try it
> >again unless someone out there beats me to it.
> >
> >vtl5c3 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I don't have a serge phase shifter, but I was re-reading its description
> the other night in the
> >>STS catalog and have been contemplating this:
> >>
> >>Since it has no fixed resonance control, and requires a mixer to feed a
> signal back in, what
> >>happens if you mix multiple outputs (say 360 degrees and 720) back in
> simultaneously? Is
> >>there a sonic difference than if only the higher output (720) is fed back
> in?
> >>
> >>Romeo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Keep on Patchin'!
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> m/n/m/l
> surreal electronic music, sound, noise
> http://www.mnmlnoise.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Keep on Patchin'!
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>