Re: Matrix mixers
2004-08-31 by S V G
John,
Ok, I get it. You're using the Ghost as a matrix mixer, routing sounds out of and back into
the Serge and back out to a recording device? Making full use of auxillary sends and sub mixes?
This then makes a lot of sense. I guess I was just thinking of a recording device that mixes down
32 channels into a stereo feed. Coming from the heyday of the Teac 3340, I was able to fit most
of my compositional thinking into 4 to 8 tracks.
I use my Mackie 1604 and 3204 in this same way, as a matrix mixer.
Stephen
Ok, I get it. You're using the Ghost as a matrix mixer, routing sounds out of and back into
the Serge and back out to a recording device? Making full use of auxillary sends and sub mixes?
This then makes a lot of sense. I guess I was just thinking of a recording device that mixes down
32 channels into a stereo feed. Coming from the heyday of the Teac 3340, I was able to fit most
of my compositional thinking into 4 to 8 tracks.
I use my Mackie 1604 and 3204 in this same way, as a matrix mixer.
Stephen
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > ... boys will be boys huh?....and just what would you suggest? I could wax profound as to why__________________________________
> i use such big mixer. Suffice to say that my compositional style requires as many channels as
> possible.
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail