Yahoo Groups archive

SergeModular

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:13 UTC

Thread

Considering first m-boat?:

Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-13 by tbby_t

Howdy Serge-people:

While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.

Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.

Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.

So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.

Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-13 by b3nnysf

Hi,

I'm at a similar point, In that I really am longing for the TKB... and have thought a bunch about the SKP... Well, to be honest I've been dreaming of two SKP's in one m-boat... or even 1 SKP and one CV matrix mixer... anyways.

Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...

If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the ÷N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...

Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!

that's my take on it.

later,
ben
..
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@...> wrote:
>
> Howdy Serge-people:
>
> While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
>
> Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
>
> Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
>
> So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
>
> Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-13 by sascha victoria

Don't forget Volta should be coming out soon so that could potentially do an amazing job as far as sequencing goes...


Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:27 AM, b3nnysf <b3nnysf@...> wrote:


Hi,

I'm at a similar point, In that I really am longing for the TKB... and have thought a bunch about the SKP... Well, to be honest I've been dreaming of two SKP's in one m-boat... or even 1 SKP and one CV matrix mixer... anyways.

Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...

If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the ÷N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...

Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!

that's my take on it.

later,
ben
..



--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@...> wrote:
>
> Howdy Serge-people:
>
> While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
>
> Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
>
> Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
>
> So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
>
> Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
>


Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-13 by tbby_t

True, but somehow, I just want to keep my computer out of it. Must be some kind of irrational hardware bias on my part.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, sascha victoria <sascha.victoria@...> wrote:
>
> Don't forget Volta should be coming out soon so that could potentially do an
> amazing job as far as sequencing goes...
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:27 AM, b3nnysf <b3nnysf@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm at a similar point, In that I really am longing for the TKB... and have
> > thought a bunch about the SKP... Well, to be honest I've been dreaming of
> > two SKP's in one m-boat... or even 1 SKP and one CV matrix mixer... anyways.
> >
> > Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to
> > hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes
> > track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose--
> > filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...
> >
> > If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be
> > lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP?
> > well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with
> > that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a
> > CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It
> > also has the ÷N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The
> > creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck
> > in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...
> >
> > Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a
> > 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!
> >
> > that's my take on it.
> >
> > later,
> > ben
> > ..
> >
> >
> > --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com <SergeModular%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Howdy Serge-people:
> > >
> > > While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've
> > never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I
> > may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
> > >
> > > Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted
> > crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite
> > some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha
> > tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no
> > real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k
> > and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing
> > guitar.
> > >
> > > Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast
> > understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel...
> > well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect
> > the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no
> > way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days)
> > with both.
> > >
> > > So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either
> > sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep
> > in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the
> > mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time
> > I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing
> > (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be
> > more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully
> > understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
> > >
> > > Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-13 by tbby_t

Oh... of course now i've seen my future poverty pass before my eyes.

You've brought up a very interesting point: in a practical (and to my mind traditional) sense, I have my sequencing needs covered by the mpc... I may be better served by filling the boat with oscs. However, not ever having access to an analog sequencer, even the 8x2 in the seq-a is novel and tempting. I guess I was kind of imagining alot more triggering coming over midi than cv (i.e. [bang] stage advance, or [bang] up/down, reset, hold, etc.). Of course then I'd simultaneously have CVs for whatever else. Not sure if that makes any sense. I can kind of imagine stepping through eight variations of complex drone, as well as more squirbly/sequency type things. I guess this is kind of a workflow/inspiration-type issue.

Ergh.

Ultimately, I don't know... but I'm not sure I can realistically hold out on a TKB. That would indeed be nice, but I just get the feeling I'd want to fill up two panels first (in which case it's certainly not going to hurt to have a smaller sequencer alongside, should I ever get there).

Thanks for the feedback. I suspect I'll figure this out over the next few days and give Rex a call.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm at a similar point, In that I really am longing for the TKB... and have thought a bunch about the SKP... Well, to be honest I've been dreaming of two SKP's in one m-boat... or even 1 SKP and one CV matrix mixer... anyways.
>
> Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...
>
> If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the ÷N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...
>
> Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!
>
> that's my take on it.
>
> later,
> ben
> ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy Serge-people:
> >
> > While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
> >
> > Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
> >
> > Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
> >
> > So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
> >
> > Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
> >
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-13 by jarg_marbin

I just entered the analog synthesis world myself with my first m-boat purchase: crature + audio interface last week.

I got this combo to turn all the audio I'm already good at creating (via gadgetry like Kaossilator and other instruments I've accumulated) into processed CV and gate signals. I'm still waiting for the Audio Interface unit to arrive, so in the meantime I'm going to build the "MIDIbox CV" (offers 8 CVs, 8 gates, DIY) http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_cv.html to provide another method of interfacing the instrument.

It was really tough for me to choose the right partner for my creature, especially when it's my first analog purchase, and not ever having seen or used one in real life before. I knew I wanted a flexible, expressive instrument, without too much redundancy. I also wanted to integrate the instrument into the music i've already been creating.

After reading every piece of documentation I could find, looking at every m-odule at http://www.vintagesynth.com/misc/serge.php, watching every youtube video, and talking to Rex several times, I was going over the M-odules again and when I saw the Audio Interface this time I knew right away.

I think the key is knowing what you want to do with it, and knowing about the great many external sequencing/CV/Gate options to control the thing.

MCV4 + serge

2009-04-14 by hansgrusel

hey ben,
i just got a doepfer MCV4 to trigger my serge + euro rack stuff together and it's tracking poorly. can you inform further on the "grounding kit"?

many thanks!
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...
>
> If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the �N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...
>
> Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!
>
> that's my take on it.
>
> later,
> ben
> ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy Serge-people:
> >
> > While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
> >
> > Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
> >
> > Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
> >
> > So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
> >
> > Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
> >
>

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-14 by b3nnysf

hey Hans,

No problem. the grounding "kit" was merely a "spade" with a banana plug input, your supposed to put the spade under a screw and tighten it down on your device to be grounded with the serge, then you connect the long black banana cable to the serge power supply and to the spade...

http://www.testpath.com/Items/Adapter-Shrouded-Banana-Jack-to-6-Spade-Lug-Black-112-785.htm

Now, I took off the spade and soldered a solid core wire there instead, and I partially unscrew the sleeve on the 1/4 inch connector, then screw it back down tight with the wire pinched in between. This 1/4 plugs into the CV1 output on MCV4. On the other end of the 1/4 inch wire is a banana plug (I got a bundle of 1/4 to banana wires from Rex) and this is plugged into the 1 volt per octave on the NTO or PCO. Perfect tracking over the entire keyboard. Other modules dont track perfectly such as DSG and the right half of the TGO, and to some degree the left half of the TGO ( 4 octaves good )

I hope that helps. :)

later,
ben
..
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "hansgrusel" <hansgrusel@...> wrote:
>
> hey ben,
> i just got a doepfer MCV4 to trigger my serge + euro rack stuff together and it's tracking poorly. can you inform further on the "grounding kit"?
>
> many thanks!
>
> >
> > Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...
> >
> > If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the �N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...
> >
> > Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!
> >
> > that's my take on it.
> >
> > later,
> > ben
> > ..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Howdy Serge-people:
> > >
> > > While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
> > >
> > > Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
> > >
> > > Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
> > >
> > > So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
> > >
> > > Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
> > >
> >
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-14 by tbby_t

That midibox cv makes me wish I had some better DIY chops.

It seems with the proliferation of m-odules that there are many folks looking at a creature + [x] boat. (As Ben notes above, the creature may well be the best bang-for-buck in the format.)

So it seems I'm still torn on [x], which will certainly impact my further decision regarding midi conversion from my existing toys... at least insofar as the immediate future is concerned. My options seem to have narrowed to two:

Should we let [x] = dual osc (I'll admit I hadn't really considered this, but it is damn tempting) I'm sonically capable of approaching "massive" territory... hell, I could even coax some duophonics... maybe. I'd likely be looking for a high resolution converter and would be more concerned with multiple cv than gates. All sequencing duties would remain in the MPC. My guess is that this would tend to lead me to a more "traditional" approach (at least as far as my historical way-of-doing-things is concerned). I'm also wondering at this point if I shouldn't just grab an Animal panel.

Should we let [x] = seq-a (this is really where I started, thanks in part to kkonkkrete's youtube vid), while I may still do some note for note sequencing from the MPC, I'd probably spend a whole lot more of my time programming gates/triggers to control some seq-a functions. My convertor would now need more gates than CV (and from my preliminary research, it seems it would be a custom or DIY solution).

Rambling here, I know... but I'm not one to take this lightly. I'm sure I'll make up my mind in a few days.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "jarg_marbin" <jarg_marbin@...> wrote:
>
> I just entered the analog synthesis world myself with my first m-boat purchase: crature + audio interface last week.
>
> I got this combo to turn all the audio I'm already good at creating (via gadgetry like Kaossilator and other instruments I've accumulated) into processed CV and gate signals. I'm still waiting for the Audio Interface unit to arrive, so in the meantime I'm going to build the "MIDIbox CV" (offers 8 CVs, 8 gates, DIY) http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_cv.html to provide another method of interfacing the instrument.
>
> It was really tough for me to choose the right partner for my creature, especially when it's my first analog purchase, and not ever having seen or used one in real life before. I knew I wanted a flexible, expressive instrument, without too much redundancy. I also wanted to integrate the instrument into the music i've already been creating.
>
> After reading every piece of documentation I could find, looking at every m-odule at http://www.vintagesynth.com/misc/serge.php, watching every youtube video, and talking to Rex several times, I was going over the M-odules again and when I saw the Audio Interface this time I knew right away.
>
> I think the key is knowing what you want to do with it, and knowing about the great many external sequencing/CV/Gate options to control the thing.
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-14 by b3nnysf

hi,

I just want to throw another wrench into your decision making machine.
lets look at the SQP real quick. It has trigger inputs for each step. These can then act as "sound presets", for example, you tune a bassdrum sound with the 4 voltages of step 1-- controlling various params on your serge. Then you tune a snare on step 2 (most likely a real funky snare because of limitations and creativity to overcome these)

OK, so now you still have 4 "presets" to make other sounds, bass, hi-hats whatever...

Trigger these steps with two gates. could be from your midi box, or a drum machine or even a really hot sample from the MPC's outputs. Now tweak params on your serge... (run it through a delay) instant analog drum heaven..

Sounds fantastic... I dont even own one yet!!!! AAArgh!
later,
ben
..
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@...> wrote:
>
> That midibox cv makes me wish I had some better DIY chops.
>
> It seems with the proliferation of m-odules that there are many folks looking at a creature + [x] boat. (As Ben notes above, the creature may well be the best bang-for-buck in the format.)
>
> So it seems I'm still torn on [x], which will certainly impact my further decision regarding midi conversion from my existing toys... at least insofar as the immediate future is concerned. My options seem to have narrowed to two:
>
> Should we let [x] = dual osc (I'll admit I hadn't really considered this, but it is damn tempting) I'm sonically capable of approaching "massive" territory... hell, I could even coax some duophonics... maybe. I'd likely be looking for a high resolution converter and would be more concerned with multiple cv than gates. All sequencing duties would remain in the MPC. My guess is that this would tend to lead me to a more "traditional" approach (at least as far as my historical way-of-doing-things is concerned). I'm also wondering at this point if I shouldn't just grab an Animal panel.
>
> Should we let [x] = seq-a (this is really where I started, thanks in part to kkonkkrete's youtube vid), while I may still do some note for note sequencing from the MPC, I'd probably spend a whole lot more of my time programming gates/triggers to control some seq-a functions. My convertor would now need more gates than CV (and from my preliminary research, it seems it would be a custom or DIY solution).
>
> Rambling here, I know... but I'm not one to take this lightly. I'm sure I'll make up my mind in a few days.
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "jarg_marbin" <jarg_marbin@> wrote:
> >
> > I just entered the analog synthesis world myself with my first m-boat purchase: crature + audio interface last week.
> >
> > I got this combo to turn all the audio I'm already good at creating (via gadgetry like Kaossilator and other instruments I've accumulated) into processed CV and gate signals. I'm still waiting for the Audio Interface unit to arrive, so in the meantime I'm going to build the "MIDIbox CV" (offers 8 CVs, 8 gates, DIY) http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_cv.html to provide another method of interfacing the instrument.
> >
> > It was really tough for me to choose the right partner for my creature, especially when it's my first analog purchase, and not ever having seen or used one in real life before. I knew I wanted a flexible, expressive instrument, without too much redundancy. I also wanted to integrate the instrument into the music i've already been creating.
> >
> > After reading every piece of documentation I could find, looking at every m-odule at http://www.vintagesynth.com/misc/serge.php, watching every youtube video, and talking to Rex several times, I was going over the M-odules again and when I saw the Audio Interface this time I knew right away.
> >
> > I think the key is knowing what you want to do with it, and knowing about the great many external sequencing/CV/Gate options to control the thing.
> >
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-14 by tbby_t

Ben,

You can't see me shaking my fist at you through this screen and over the internets, can you?

Shame. Just imagine it, I guess.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@...> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I just want to throw another wrench into your decision making machine.
> lets look at the SQP real quick. It has trigger inputs for each step. These can then act as "sound presets", for example, you tune a bassdrum sound with the 4 voltages of step 1-- controlling various params on your serge. Then you tune a snare on step 2 (most likely a real funky snare because of limitations and creativity to overcome these)
>
> OK, so now you still have 4 "presets" to make other sounds, bass, hi-hats whatever...
>
> Trigger these steps with two gates. could be from your midi box, or a drum machine or even a really hot sample from the MPC's outputs. Now tweak params on your serge... (run it through a delay) instant analog drum heaven..
>
> Sounds fantastic... I dont even own one yet!!!! AAArgh!
> later,
> ben
> ..
>
>
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> >
> > That midibox cv makes me wish I had some better DIY chops.
> >
> > It seems with the proliferation of m-odules that there are many folks looking at a creature + [x] boat. (As Ben notes above, the creature may well be the best bang-for-buck in the format.)
> >
> > So it seems I'm still torn on [x], which will certainly impact my further decision regarding midi conversion from my existing toys... at least insofar as the immediate future is concerned. My options seem to have narrowed to two:
> >
> > Should we let [x] = dual osc (I'll admit I hadn't really considered this, but it is damn tempting) I'm sonically capable of approaching "massive" territory... hell, I could even coax some duophonics... maybe. I'd likely be looking for a high resolution converter and would be more concerned with multiple cv than gates. All sequencing duties would remain in the MPC. My guess is that this would tend to lead me to a more "traditional" approach (at least as far as my historical way-of-doing-things is concerned). I'm also wondering at this point if I shouldn't just grab an Animal panel.
> >
> > Should we let [x] = seq-a (this is really where I started, thanks in part to kkonkkrete's youtube vid), while I may still do some note for note sequencing from the MPC, I'd probably spend a whole lot more of my time programming gates/triggers to control some seq-a functions. My convertor would now need more gates than CV (and from my preliminary research, it seems it would be a custom or DIY solution).
> >
> > Rambling here, I know... but I'm not one to take this lightly. I'm sure I'll make up my mind in a few days.
> >
> > --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "jarg_marbin" <jarg_marbin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just entered the analog synthesis world myself with my first m-boat purchase: crature + audio interface last week.
> > >
> > > I got this combo to turn all the audio I'm already good at creating (via gadgetry like Kaossilator and other instruments I've accumulated) into processed CV and gate signals. I'm still waiting for the Audio Interface unit to arrive, so in the meantime I'm going to build the "MIDIbox CV" (offers 8 CVs, 8 gates, DIY) http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_cv.html to provide another method of interfacing the instrument.
> > >
> > > It was really tough for me to choose the right partner for my creature, especially when it's my first analog purchase, and not ever having seen or used one in real life before. I knew I wanted a flexible, expressive instrument, without too much redundancy. I also wanted to integrate the instrument into the music i've already been creating.
> > >
> > > After reading every piece of documentation I could find, looking at every m-odule at http://www.vintagesynth.com/misc/serge.php, watching every youtube video, and talking to Rex several times, I was going over the M-odules again and when I saw the Audio Interface this time I knew right away.
> > >
> > > I think the key is knowing what you want to do with it, and knowing about the great many external sequencing/CV/Gate options to control the thing.
> > >
> >
>

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-14 by hansgrusel

thanks ben:
can you clarify: "your supposed to put the spade under a screw" which screw are you referring to? a screw on the MCV4?

Many thanks for the info!
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> hey Hans,
>
> No problem. the grounding "kit" was merely a "spade" with a banana plug input, your supposed to put the spade under a screw and tighten it down on your device to be grounded with the serge, then you connect the long black banana cable to the serge power supply and to the spade...
>
> http://www.testpath.com/Items/Adapter-Shrouded-Banana-Jack-to-6-Spade-Lug-Black-112-785.htm
>
> Now, I took off the spade and soldered a solid core wire there instead, and I partially unscrew the sleeve on the 1/4 inch connector, then screw it back down tight with the wire pinched in between. This 1/4 plugs into the CV1 output on MCV4. On the other end of the 1/4 inch wire is a banana plug (I got a bundle of 1/4 to banana wires from Rex) and this is plugged into the 1 volt per octave on the NTO or PCO. Perfect tracking over the entire keyboard. Other modules dont track perfectly such as DSG and the right half of the TGO, and to some degree the left half of the TGO ( 4 octaves good )
>
> I hope that helps. :)
>
> later,
> ben
> ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "hansgrusel" <hansgrusel@> wrote:
> >
> > hey ben,
> > i just got a doepfer MCV4 to trigger my serge + euro rack stuff together and it's tracking poorly. can you inform further on the "grounding kit"?
> >
> > many thanks!
> >
> > >
> > > Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...
> > >
> > > If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the �N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...
> > >
> > > Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!
> > >
> > > that's my take on it.
> > >
> > > later,
> > > ben
> > > ..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy Serge-people:
> > > >
> > > > While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
> > > >
> > > > Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
> > > >
> > > > Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
> > > >
> > > > So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-14 by b3nnysf

hey hans,

yeah, under one of the chassis screws works great for the ground... Also the sleeve (ring) on a jack, or interconnect cable is the ground too.

You only have to ground one thing in the chain... If you use a Tr-606 to trigger a sequencer, grounding one of the wires works for both...

later,
ben
..
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "hansgrusel" <hansgrusel@...> wrote:
>
> thanks ben:
> can you clarify: "your supposed to put the spade under a screw" which screw are you referring to? a screw on the MCV4?
>
> Many thanks for the info!
>
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > hey Hans,
> >
> > No problem. the grounding "kit" was merely a "spade" with a banana plug input, your supposed to put the spade under a screw and tighten it down on your device to be grounded with the serge, then you connect the long black banana cable to the serge power supply and to the spade...
> >
> > http://www.testpath.com/Items/Adapter-Shrouded-Banana-Jack-to-6-Spade-Lug-Black-112-785.htm
> >
> > Now, I took off the spade and soldered a solid core wire there instead, and I partially unscrew the sleeve on the 1/4 inch connector, then screw it back down tight with the wire pinched in between. This 1/4 plugs into the CV1 output on MCV4. On the other end of the 1/4 inch wire is a banana plug (I got a bundle of 1/4 to banana wires from Rex) and this is plugged into the 1 volt per octave on the NTO or PCO. Perfect tracking over the entire keyboard. Other modules dont track perfectly such as DSG and the right half of the TGO, and to some degree the left half of the TGO ( 4 octaves good )
> >
> > I hope that helps. :)
> >
> > later,
> > ben
> > ..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "hansgrusel" <hansgrusel@> wrote:
> > >
> > > hey ben,
> > > i just got a doepfer MCV4 to trigger my serge + euro rack stuff together and it's tracking poorly. can you inform further on the "grounding kit"?
> > >
> > > many thanks!
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Serge land is easily conquered by the midi cv gate converter, its a snap to hook up the grounding kit (one wire) to the doepfer MCV4, from there, notes track perfectly (with NTO, PCO) and mod wheel can be anything you choose-- filter cutoff, wave multiplyer, LFO speed...
> > > >
> > > > If I may extrapolate from what you posted, I think the Mpc3000 would be lovely with a dual osc and creature and midi-cv converter. Why not the SKP? well because you really want the TKB (like me) and you should stick with that. The dual osc will track notes correctly with the midi-cv and it has a CV mixer witch is very useful for subtle modulation and feedback loops. It also has the �N which is good for "beats" and other weird patches...The creature is extremely powerful because it packs the most bang for the buck in the m-class, being both normal and completely strange...
> > > >
> > > > Then buy the TKB and you'll be ruling with a 16 step with 4 voltages OR a 64 step sequencer 1 voltage sequencer!!
> > > >
> > > > that's my take on it.
> > > >
> > > > later,
> > > > ben
> > > > ..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Howdy Serge-people:
> > > > >
> > > > > While I've been fascinated with these synths for a long long time, I've never touched one. Given a recent peek at the bank account, I'm thinking I may just go ahead and splurge on a panel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, to be fair, I'm probably not the synth-savviest; there's a busted crumar ds-2 in my living room, and I have spent a good couple years (quite some years ago) front-panel programming an oberheim matrix6r and a yamaha tx802 (which is to say i'm well acquainted with frustration, but have no real modular experience). I've really been much more sample-oriented (mpc3k and a pair of s900s), and have actually returned (atop this all) to playing guitar.
> > > > >
> > > > > Serge-wise, to say I'm fascinated by the TKB would be a vast understatement. Unfortunately, pairing it with say, an Animal panel... well... I'm not sure I can justify the expense at the moment. Plus I suspect the TKB would be somewhat underused in such a small system - but there's no way for me to really know without having spent some serious hours (days) with both.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I'm leaning toward an M-boat loaded with a Creature and either sequencer A or an SQP. Would the SQP be underutilized in this setting? Keep in mind that I can certainly figure out how to convert some midi from the mpc into cv/gate (I hope that doesn't offend you guys), but at the same time I'd like to not be forced to. I kind of like the idea of dual sequencing (externally from the midibox and natively). I suspect the sequencer A may be more interesting in this regard. Again though, I'm sure I won't fully understand these funtions until I've messed with them for a while.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry if that was longish, but what do you guys think?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-15 by hansgrusel

Thank you Ben.
info is very much appreciated.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@...> wrote:
>
> hey hans,
>
> yeah, under one of the chassis screws works great for the ground... Also the sleeve (ring) on a jack, or interconnect cable is the ground too.
>
> You only have to ground one thing in the chain... If you use a Tr-606 to trigger a sequencer, grounding one of the wires works for both...
>
> later,
> ben
> ..
>

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-15 by Carlos

or you can get this (no power needed):

http://www.analoguehaven.com/makenoise/formatjumbler/

and then you never have to worry about grounding and interfacing with other equipment ever again.

I have 2.

C.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "hansgrusel" <hansgrusel@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you Ben.
> info is very much appreciated.
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@> wrote:
> >
> > hey hans,
> >
> > yeah, under one of the chassis screws works great for the ground... Also the sleeve (ring) on a jack, or interconnect cable is the ground too.
> >
> > You only have to ground one thing in the chain... If you use a Tr-606 to trigger a sequencer, grounding one of the wires works for both...
> >
> > later,
> > ben
> > ..
> >
>

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-15 by Bakis Sirros

or the Metalbox patchpanels (if you have frac rack):

http://www.metalbox.com/modules/patch.html

both the Makenoise formatjumbler and the Metalbox patch panels are great, btw. (i have both).

Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Carlos <bushwick@...> wrote:

From: Carlos <bushwick@...>
Subject: [SergeModular] Re: MCV4 + serge
To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 5:47 PM

or you can get this (no power needed):

http://www.analogue haven.com/ makenoise/ formatjumbler/

and then you never have to worry about grounding and interfacing with other equipment ever again.

I have 2.

C.

--- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, "hansgrusel" <hansgrusel@ ...> wrote:
>
> Thank you Ben.
> info is very much appreciated.
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, "b3nnysf" <b3nnysf@> wrote:
> >
> > hey hans,
> >
> > yeah, under one of the chassis screws works great for the ground... Also the sleeve (ring) on a jack, or interconnect cable is the ground too.
> >
> > You only have to ground one thing in the chain... If you use a Tr-606 to trigger a sequencer, grounding one of the wires works for both...
> >
> > later,
> > ben
> > ..
> >
>


Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-16 by Christopher Jacob Recording Device

That would be great! Hell, if those black panels could also act as a system interface/grounding kit to work with Euro/Frac and MOTM format systems I would by that in an instant.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:05 AM, <sprgroups@...> wrote:




> or the Metalbox patchpanels (if you have frac rack):
>
> http://www.metalbox.com/modules/patch.html

Surely the most elegant solution would be to incorporate this
function into the black centre panel in the M boats?

Steve




--
"War will end when people refuse to fight"
--Anonymous

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-16 by kkonkkrete

Maybe I'm missing something here: you don't need mults in a banana system, and you already get a (stackable) common grounding banana socket on the power supply. Rex provides cables that are banana at one end and your favourite TR-plug on the other: these can be used to hook up to a Euro, Frac or any other standard. So what would be the additional benefits? Maybe there is something I haven't thought of.

I do agree it would be nice to see the black strip do more than glare at you with it's blue eye. Like having a VCA or some CV attenuators or some other utility units in there.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Jacob Recording Device <I.AM.USING.THE.INTERNETS@...> wrote:
>
> That would be great! Hell, if those black panels could also act as a system
> interface/grounding kit to work with Euro/Frac and MOTM format systems I
> would by that in an instant.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:05 AM, <sprgroups@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > or the Metalbox patchpanels (if you have frac rack):
> > >
> > > http://www.metalbox.com/modules/patch.html
> >
> > Surely the most elegant solution would be to incorporate this
> > function into the black centre panel in the M boats?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "War will end when people refuse to fight"
> --Anonymous
>

Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-16 by kkonkkrete

> Should we let [x] = dual osc (I'll admit I hadn't really considered this, but it is damn tempting) I'm sonically capable of approaching "massive" territory... hell, I could even coax some duophonics... maybe. I'd likely be looking for a high resolution converter and would be more concerned with multiple cv than gates. All sequencing duties would remain in the MPC. My guess is that this would tend to lead me to a more "traditional" approach (at least as far as my historical way-of-doing-things is concerned). I'm also wondering at this point if I shouldn't just grab an Animal panel.

If you are planning on going for a "voice-only" panel (i.e. no sequencer), I'd just get an Animal, unless you *really* want /N comp or a TGO. Better density that a dual-osc + creature IMHO, and almost the same price.

> Should we let [x] = seq-a (this is really where I started, thanks in part to kkonkkrete's youtube vid), while I may still do some note for note sequencing from the MPC, I'd probably spend a whole lot more of my time programming gates/triggers to control some seq-a functions. My convertor would now need more gates than CV (and from my preliminary research, it seems it would be a custom or DIY solution).

This really depends on what you want to use your system for. I thought I really needed a sequencer, because I wanted a completely stand-alone 1-panel unit, which could do melodic things and that I could play while sitting on the sofa. The Seq-A can certainly do a lot more than just pitched sequences. On the other hand, the deeper I get into Serge synthesis, the more I realise that I often want more "voice" --- many of my patches use everything except the sequencer sub-unit of the Seq-A M-odule. You can do a huge amount without a sequencer. In some ways, I wish I had got an Animal and a TKB. On the other hand, the creature on its own is SO amazing that pretty much any pairing and you'll end up with a superb little system.

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-16 by sprgroups@o2.co.uk

> You don't need mults in a banana system,


Agreed. Early Serges had mults, and they can make patches tidier,
but Serge stopped providing them 30 years ago and I don't hear
many complaints.


> Rex provides cables that are banana at one end and your favourite
> TR-plug on the other: these can be used to hook up to a Euro, Frac
> or any other standard.


Having to include an earth cable to the power supply earth works,
but it's a clumsy solution, and it often leads to confusion and
questions on this list.


A jack to banana adaptor is just easier and more obvious. They
used to be available (e.g. CV interface module) but presumably
got dropped because most people don't want 8 adaptors taking
up 3" of panel and costing $240! Two or three adaptors on the
black panel seems like a much better idea.


> I do agree it would be nice to see the black strip do more than
> glare at you with it's blue eye. Like having a VCA or some CV
> attenuators or some other utility units in there.


I think many on the list would agree with that. It would be good
to see a range of small centre modules so you still have a limited
degree of customisation available. Maybe a C/M version, a CV or
audio mixer, jack/banana adaptor, gate/pulse combiner?


And if they match the rest of the panels in style and color,
that would please a few of us...



Steve

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-16 by sascha victoria

Yes, the Make Noise Format Jumbler acts as a mult. But it also acts as a jack converter from Banana to 1/8 to 1/4 while also having a grounding banana jack for the Serge system. If you are interfacing your Serge system with EuroRack that module would be hella useful.


Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:41 AM, <sprgroups@...> wrote:



> You don't need mults in a banana system,

Agreed. Early Serges had mults, and they can make patches tidier,
but Serge stopped providing them 30 years ago and I don't hear
many complaints.


> Rex provides cables that are banana at one end and your favourite
> TR-plug on the other: these can be used to hook up to a Euro, Frac
> or any other standard.

Having to include an earth cable to the power supply earth works,
but it's a clumsy solution, and it often leads to confusion and
questions on this list.

A jack to banana adaptor is just easier and more obvious. They
used to be available (e.g. CV interface module) but presumably
got dropped because most people don't want 8 adaptors taking
up 3" of panel and costing $240! Two or three adaptors on the
black panel seems like a much better idea.


> I do agree it would be nice to see the black strip do more than
> glare at you with it's blue eye. Like having a VCA or some CV
> attenuators or some other utility units in there.

I think many on the list would agree with that. It would be good
to see a range of small centre modules so you still have a limited
degree of customisation available. Maybe a C/M version, a CV or
audio mixer, jack/banana adaptor, gate/pulse combiner?

And if they match the rest of the panels in style and color,
that would please a few of us...

Steve


Re: Considering first m-boat?:

2009-04-16 by tbby_t

> If you are planning on going for a "voice-only" panel (i.e. no sequencer), I'd just get an Animal, unless you *really* want /N comp or a TGO. Better density that a dual-osc + creature IMHO, and almost the same price.

This has become the crux of my decision: to sequence natively (on-panel) or not... still chewing on it.

> I thought I really needed a sequencer, because I wanted a completely stand-alone 1-panel unit, which could do melodic things and that I could play while sitting on the sofa.

Yes, I was/am thinking along the same lines.

Spoke with Rex yesterday (great guy, btw), and given my specific application (part of which whll require tracking to standard western tonalities), it may be a good idea to look toward NTOs/PCOs.

Though I'm not sure if a Seq-A + Dual Osc wouldn't short me on slopes, should I want to include the sequencer, of course.

If on the other hand I decide to go voice only, as mentioned above, I may start leaning toward the Animal, though I'm not sure that "almost the same price" is valid.

It's coming together.

Re: MCV4 + serge

2009-04-19 by zaum

> Agreed. Early Serges had mults, and they can make patches tidier,
> but Serge stopped providing them 30 years ago and I don't hear
> many complaints.

I have a theory that back in the 70s labs had a lot of non-stackable
bananas lying around.

> A jack to banana adaptor is just easier and more obvious. They
> used to be available (e.g. CV interface module) but presumably
> got dropped because most people don't want 8 adaptors taking
> up 3" of panel and costing $240! Two or three adaptors on the
> black panel seems like a much better idea.

True, then again I have an external carrier FS which has boards 3
module widths and only a 2 module width front panel so I opted to
have Rex add adapters to the otherwise blank module width the PCBs
were extending into

Putting some passive attenuators on the center strip would work well
in terms of using the space and simplicity. Wouldn't be hard to DYI,

Boat Ordered (!):

2009-04-21 by tbby_t

> It's coming together.

Well, after some consideration, I took it full circle: ending up exactly where I began.

Now, the waiting...

Re: Boat Ordered (!):

2009-04-22 by kkonkkrete

> Well, after some consideration, I took it full circle: ending up exactly where I began.
>
> Now, the waiting...

Congratulations! STS are much quicker than most other bespoke synth companies, so hopefully your wait won't be too long. So you went for Seq-A and Creature in the end? It is a great combination. The sequencer is great as a sub-oscillator ...

Re: Boat Ordered (!):

2009-04-22 by BooleanYulian

Darn right... another <nameless> modular manufacturer that also uses bananas has been holding my money (fully prepaid!!) since November 3rd, has promissed to deliver the (small) completed order by Xmas and has not delivered ANYTHING yet.. wont even give me an APROXIMATE ETA and wont even provide me with a reason...

Way to go Rex!!! You truely are the King!!! Thank you for evrything.. doing business with you is not only smooth and professional, but also very enjoyable.

Y.

On 22-Apr-09, at 2:56 AM, kkonkkrete wrote:




> Well, after some consideration, I took it full circle: ending up exactly where I began.
>
> Now, the waiting...

Congratulations! STS are much quicker than most other bespoke synth companies, so hopefully your wait won't be too long. So you went for Seq-A and Creature in the end? It is a great combination. The sequencer is great as a sub-oscillator ...


Re: Boat Ordered (!):

2009-04-24 by tbby_t

> So you went for Seq-A and Creature in the end? It is a great combination. The sequencer is great as a sub-oscillator ...

Yeah... I think it's probably my best option all things considered. Rex seems fond of reminding me that the sequencer can be clocked at audio rates, should I so desire.

I'm also grabbing a bundle of 1/4" phone-to-banana cables that can feed in some external triggering (most likely from audio outs of the sampler).

This is going to be fun.

Boat Received (!):

2009-05-18 by tbby_t

> Now, the waiting...

Oh, man... mindbender. I can't effectively describe... been essentially post-verbal since last wednesday. Now I just have to steer all this madness into "useful" madness.

Heh.

Re: Boat Received (!):

2009-05-19 by kkonkkrete

Congratulations! Enjoy the madness!

--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "tbby_t" <tbby_t@...> wrote:
>
> > Now, the waiting...
>
> Oh, man... mindbender. I can't effectively describe... been essentially post-verbal since last wednesday. Now I just have to steer all this madness into "useful" madness.
>
> Heh.
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.