> Quality? Let's look at signal-to-noise. According to the Synthsizers.com > FAQ, the dotcom VCA has "a signal to noise ratio of 82db (CD quality is > around 96db)." The MOTM-190 has a dynamic range of "better than 100dB." > That's a very big difference. It might be useful to note that signal to noise ratio is different than the noise floor. The noise floor is the actual hiss (thermal noise). Signal to noise ratio is the ratio between the test sine signal peak and the next lowest signal peak. This is usually the second harmonic distortion. A second harmonic distortion of -82 dB is approx. a THD of 0.005% or as good as virtually all audiophile hi-fi gear. Analog to digital converters have a noise floor fixed by the math of 6 dB per bit (hence 96 dB for 16 bit). Based on my measurements at Wiard, the noise floor of a TL074 is about equal to the self noise of a 24 bit converter. An LM837 is about -15 dB below the same 24 bit converter. But the signal to noise ratio is -60 dB or so because the THD is 0.02% (second harmonic at -60 dB). This is plenty good enough for prime time! The major source of hiss noise will come from the A to D inputs of the digital compositing system you use, rather than the analog equipment.
Message
Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???
2005-01-21 by grantrichter2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.