Hi Cynthia! > For most applications it's not really any big deal at all, in fact it seems to add even more > LIFE to the sound that there is yet another layer of modulation. As you say, that depends on the application. > If on the otherhand, a specific scientific or calculated approach requires the precision of > a constant amplitude waveform, then one has available the five non-morphing constant > amplitude waveform outputs to use, (Sine, Triangle, Pulse/Square, Saw, RevSaw). I'm into heavy experimental noise stuff where "noise" doesn't imply inaccuracy. That's why I'm using high grade analouge electronics. My (our) approaches sometimes appear to be rather academic while I don't want to call it like this (it would be an offence to an real academic). So I'm pondering if I could achieve the desired accuracy anyway or not and, most important, if we need that. > An inverter and a DC Coupled VCA or CrossFade might be easily patched-up to act > as an "Auto Morph Amplitude Compensation" circuit, but the amplitude thing had yet > to present itself as any real problem to anyone thus far. I think I just will have to find this out. Thanks, Michael.
Message
Re: [The_Cyndustries_List] Re: Constant Amplitude of Waveform?
2006-02-28 by Michael Zacherl (aka TonTaub)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.