Hey Moe, Cynthia's reply to you is correct. Carrier and modulator freqs must track. It took a little looking, but I found the paragraph I posted that was the source of your confusion: ============ To sum it all up (no pun), LinCV does not have a constant shifting effect. The amount LinCV will move F is dependent on ExpCV. Also, because the relationship is multiplicative and not additive, we do not need to scale our LinCVs with frequency to achieve constant timbre up and down the keyboard as classical FM would dictate. ============ What I meant by "scale" was the AMPLITUDE of the modulator as the freq is moved. -- and I should have said PM like in the DX-7. In PM, it is effectively the first derivative of the modulator that is used. This results in a rolloff of low freqs (it's like a -6db/oct filter) and as you move notes, you have to compensate for this. The ZO always runs everything ratiometrically, so no worries. Clear as ever, I hope. --Mark Barton --- In The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote: > > I remember a discussion awhile back where it was stated that the > modulator doesn't need to be tracking the keyboard in parallel with > the ZO being modulated. I thought the reason given was that the lin fm > component was added into the total cv separately. Or something like that. > > Anyway, > > My by the ear experiments seem to say otherwise - when I want a > constant timbre that tracks the keyboard, I end up modulating both > vcos with the kbd voltage. > > Did I misunderstand the original post? > > Moe > http://www.stoogeindustries.com >
Message
Re: Linear FM constant freq or not for constant timbre?
2006-03-20 by tuninghead
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.