(We thought about a random mix of all of the entries on
each page refresh, but thought that might that drive us
all crazy!)
The system code was written to offer anonymity if desired...
Seth.
I don't think it is stated anywhere however that a condition of
qualification must be to suppress one's meta data if embedded
into the submission itself, (did we ever say that? maybe?)
Theoretically, one could submit a three-minute commercial
for your own hair growth products, or Tupperware parties
and still qualify under our, "anything goes" provision.
(Thankfully, no one really did quite that).
I guess I could have submitted a three-minute recording of me
saying "Cynthia Webster loves bunny rabbits!" over and over
without breaking any rules.
(One would just cringe in such a case ideally, and hope that
the voting public would recognize the materials innate lack of
appropriateness to the subject of War & Peace, and insidious
lack of um... er, well, "Bugginess"!)
(Besides, that would be "bunniness", not "bugginess!")
For example, there are a few extremely competent pieces
which I feel are just way too "normal" but then,
might "normal" - be different in the eye of each beholder?
Cynthia
Say, why don't Beeholders get stung?
denshiblocks wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> also, when i open the files in my musicplayer it gives the artist for
> some and not others - was this supposed to be like a blind taste test,
> or was it up to the submitting artist to include their name or not?
>
> seth nemec
> bananalogue.com
>
> >
> > its also a shame the songs are alphabetical as most people will
> > automatically start at the top and not complete listening to all
> entries :-(
>
>