> Considering the P3's background and original remit, it's a UI that I > still find surprisingly quick once you're over that learning curve. The original remit was just for a dead-simple performance step sequencer. It was Nagle that made me add all the tricksy stuff, honest ! I find people who have used an X0X drum machine generally get the basic pattern editing straight away. I wouldn't hit someone with aux events until they get used to the normal stuff. Playlists seem to confuse a lot of people to begin with, which I think is maybe because they were grafted on after the UI was complete so it's a bit of a compromise. If I was doing it again, I'd have separate LEDs to show playlist positions and more buttons... But you don't have to use them either - enable the quick pattern select option, and you can treat it as if there are no playlists - you just use FUNC+track followed by a step key to select a new pattern for each track. The disavantage of a forum like this is that the people asking questions are still on the learning curve, so an observer might get the impression that it's really hard to use. I believe once you know how to use it, you'll find it logical and easy to get on with. If experienced users disagree with that, please let me know... Cheers, Colin f
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] question about pattern/approach philosophy
2004-07-06 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.