> ok - so then it is using the temporary last step as set in > the aux event, rather than the one at the pattern level? That > is what seems to be happening....but I'll have to look again > later tonight. If it looks at the aux event last step to > determine one repeat, then it seems to me that one complete > time through the pattern may not be reached. Yes.. the last step set by the aux event is treated as the last step as far as repeats are concerned. It would be more confusing if it wasn't, no ? I can see that might cause you a problem if you want a pattern to 'grow' in length over a specified period of time... The way to do that would be by setting a longer gbar. Ideally you'd want a gbar per track, but then it wouldn't be a gbar ;-) Cheers, Colin f
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] another question: triggering a pattern
2004-07-06 by Colin f