On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:14:32 +0100, "Colin f" <colin@colinfraser.com>
wrote:
>Wouldn't that mean you couldn't use bank init PGMs ? It'd need a separate
>'slave P3' channel that the master would send bank/part select messages on
>and the slave would listen for.
No, I don't see why. This is incoming data and quite separate to what
the P3 sends out. The Polymorph works like this - ish. Athough it
doesn't give you the cool ability to send out a specific program
change for every setup like the P3 does.
>That sounds like a good idea... I hope it fits. The current build shrunk a
>couple of pages when I tidied up a bloated UI routine, so there could some
>more optimisation to come... still 3k+ left
My goodness - the things you can do in 3K! For a start, I expect to
see remote control, all those Aux events filled with everything I ever
wanted and more, plus the transmission of specific sysex controls to
every single synth in my collection. Er, did I say please? 8-)
Paul
---
Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music
Email: paul@softroom.co.uk www.softroom.co.uk
www.BogusFocus.comMessage
Re: [analogue-sequencer] about bank switching...
2004-07-09 by Paul Nagle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.