These are excellent points. You've definitely hit on what I have in mind for this setup. I still may wimp out and get something else instead, but having a real analog modular controlled by a P3 (and also, from time to time, by Numerology), sounds too good to be true. By the way, can you save patches on a Doepfer Modular? (smiley deliberately omitted) -------------- Original message -------------- > > > hmmm - interesting. Still inclined to go with the mcv24, but > > that is something to think about. > > Probably not a bad idea... > > > > Only 4 of its outputs are of good (12bit) resolution. The > > others are 8bit, so, > > > although they all have things like software lfos and the > > like, without slew > > > limiters, these can sound lumpy. > > Midi resolution for a single controller is only 7 bit, so 8 bit CV outputs > are fine for them. > As Julian rightly points out, this resolution is too low for smooth LFO > waveforms etc. > But if you have a slew limiter module, or VCLFO, you won't want to be using > digitally generated transients anyway. > > I'd think a MCV24 driven by p3 and driving a modular would give you some > excellent potential, assuming the Doepfer modules have a lot of VC > parameters. By redirecting auxes on a few tracks to build up the number of > controllers available, you could pretty much sequence patterns that > radically change the modular patch on every step. > How about randomising the aux values so a pattern plays with a new random > patch on every step ? > > Shit, I'm going to have to get my mark II modular assembled sometime, and > finish that multi-channel CV convertor... > ;-) > > Cheers, > Colin f > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] using p3 with real modular...
2004-10-15 by implode7@comcast.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.