Analogue-sequencer

Paul Nagle wrote:
> You'll probably hate me for this but... supposing playlists worked
> like parts do? I mean, you can play parts in series starting at the
> first you hold down and ending at the last you hold down.
>
> If playlists worked the same way you could have the same flexible
> interaction that would feel intuitive because it's used elsewhere. You
> could select each step individually and it would play the pattern
> (along with any transpositions and chg mode) but if you selected two
> or more they would play round and round with the repeat setting coming
> into place in the same way as parts...
>
> Sorry, I'll go away now. I know it isn't too radical cos with
> playlists you're only able to select one pattern per step but still,
> just a thought...
>

I like it. It's good to use options that are used elsewhere. It makes the
machine easier to use.

Gert
www.waveworld.tv