Analogue-sequencer

> I was wondering also whether there was a way to use the 
> random mask to effect the skip step feature. Didn't see a way...

This isn't possible to implement.
If a step is skipped, it never becomes the current step, so events can never
act upon it to make it un-skipped.
I could potentially add an event to advance another track forward by a step,
but that could be time consuming (in terms of latency caused and
implementation time). The code to advance a pattern to it's next step is
more complicated than you might imagine (bear in mind it could be set to a
random direction, and have any number of steps skipped).

Cheers,
Colin f