Analogue-sequencer

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" <colin@c...> wrote:
> I should start by saying the arpeggio capture function wasn't really
> intended to be a 'full' arpeggiator, so it may not be a big priority for the
> remaining space, but if something simple to implement can add significant
> functionality, I'm not adverse to the idea.

I know Colin, and I am already MORE then greatfull for just building in the 
arp-mode as it is now.
But I am not in programming at all, so I thought: "just ask... :-))"
>  
> > "arp mode" (Function-Record) it would be very nice if it would be 
> > possible to set a fixed number of steps.
> 
> This could be done by having an option to automatically repeat the captured
> arpeggio up to the existing last step, but I'd need to think how that would
> interact with the existing reset behaviour.

I see. Or better: I don't. But I see, that my wishes causes cpu-overload in your 
head... 
>  
> You only have to hit REC, F1 or F2, then FUNC+REC again ! Have you no
> fingers ? ;-)

I do, but you can't change anything "on the fly" now. You can't enter new notes 
while out of Func-rec-mode. Arping is really a "live" action. That's why I asked.
> 
> > Another thing: possibilty to program the arp going up in octaves?
> 
> That can be done by setting up an aux event on the first step to offset the
> note accumulator.
> Not as direct as a 'range' setting though. If I did add a 'range' setting,
> it would just be a 'macro function' to set up the aux event required. The
> advantage of configuring your own offset is that you aren't limited to
> octave steps.

OK, Leave that out then. I am sure that when I have discovered ALL the 
goodies in the P3, I'll write a special ARP-section for Pauls tutorial :-))))
>  
> > Another thing: setting a fixed number of steps AND leaving out steps 
> > (or delaying steps, or tieing steps, or... or... OR.... :-)))  ? Or 
> > even better: having the full stepsequencer programmabilities in the 
> > arp? THAT would make it a killer arp!
> 
> Sounds like a NDub for arp capture - where the captured arpeggio 
overwrites
> only active notes, leaving gate and tie status intact.
> Hmm...

Hmmmmm........ MMMMmmmmmm!!!!!! :-)

Once again Colin, don't break your head over this. But if *any* of these wishes 
are possible without too much trouble... it would be GREAT! :-)

Thanks, Boele