> My bigger gripe with encoders is their inherent lack of resolution. > Anything more than 24 or 36 steps per rotation costs a lot of moolah, making > an acceleration algorithm fairly essential. Some bits of hardware I've used have inc/dec buttons which operate on the last-edited parameter, so you twist the knob to a value close to the one you want and then hit inc or dec a few times. When I was playing with Paul's P3 my fingers kept straying to the inc/dec buttons, even though my brain kept telling them there weren't any. Regarding LED feedback of knob positions: I wonder how many P3 users actually pay attention to the knob positions, given that the knobs are multi-mode and obviously don't track pattern changes. (I suppose one could think about a display mode where the LED's reflect the accuracy of the knobs - like the "I am now tracking" behaviour on the E-mu command stations.) -- N. -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 news
2005-08-10 by Nick Rothwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.