> I would personally NOT want a stop command sent at all > because I often > have multiple synced devices and wish to be able to stop them > manually > but restart them smoothly and individually when needed. If > the process > sent stop first, devices that I didn't stop manually would > stop too, out > of my control. I'm not sure that all devices will restart if they receive a START without having received a STOP. Will need to check... > >The first question is, should the FUNC+STOP send the STOP > *immediately*, > >rather than trying to leave slaved devices running and reset > them with Gbar > The "safe stop" function works fine now, I wouldn't personally tamper > with it. I wrote that wrong... I meant FUNC+RUN would send the stop, assuming P3 was running. Essentially, FUNC+RUN would be toggling MIDI clock off and on, with the on synced to gbar. > Just doing the Func+Run thing during playback to send a Start on the > next GBar would provide all the functionality I can currently > dream up... If it works... Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Catching up with sync thread
2005-09-20 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.