> I always thought 96ppqn was a much tighter timing, it > seems things get sloppy [correct me if I'm wrong] at > higher resolutions? Besides I never work above 90bpm, > more like between 50 and 80bpm [depending on what you're > actually using the P3 for]. Accuracy of timing is a separate issue from the resolution. You can set up a timer to trigger your sequencer code 96 times ppqn, but if the OS isn't too concerned about giving your code top priority, there could be quite a degree of variation in when it actually runs. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: ppqn resolution query
2005-11-21 by Colin f