Aha, thanks Colin, I thought I was either going mad or my P3 was not functioning correctly. It turns out it's neither, just that the manual doesn't explain this at all, maybe something to add in the next update (under FTS and part transpose). Being able to choose will be good Cheers Jez colin wrote >The FTS behaviour around PXPos was not what you might expect... >But this has been made selectable in the current beta version, which I will >post the release build of this weekend. >Up to 3.1.005, FTS was applied *before* part transposition. >Which meant in effect the root note of the FTS scale was also being >transposed by PXPos. >i.e. notes in a pattern get forced to a pattern of intervals around the >root, then get moved up by the PXPos amount, so they now fit into the >pattern of intervals around the root plus the PXPos value. >In the next release (or current beta) you can choose whether PXPos is >applied before, or after FTS. >You do this by pressing FUNC+PXPos at the appropriate play mode page. >The PXPos value will be shown with an 'F' after it if it is pre-FTS.
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] FTS on transposed patterns
2006-02-02 by Jez Creek
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.