Colin wrote >It is possible to compensate for post-FTS PXPos by transposing the FTS root >note in the opposite direction such that PXPos brings it back to where it >should be. But I took the easier option of changing the implementation >rather than trying to explain that one... Probably for the best, I feel a gumby moment coming on ;-) Jez
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] FTS on transposed patterns
2006-02-03 by Jez Creek