Gary Chang wrote:
>Of course, I submit this opinion with all due respect - this is
>already a tremendous leap forward. I am just trying to "nudge" the P3
>into the next universe, where I can use it as a really time keyboard
>alternative....
>
>
Wouldn't argue with any of your points dude, implementation of something
simple like a common Exit key and dedicated playlist edit and pattern
edit keys would be something I'd push for in any future sequencer.
Similarly, a set of dedicated track/part buttons would be ace as would
more dedicated buttons for various things or user-programmable
functionality. As for more remote control, yeah, I think this is
something Nick Rothwell was pushing for too and only Colin knows how far
he can take the current OS in that direction. Initially I'd settle for
remote control of the knobs in any mode and perhaps remote mode
switching, part switching, remote transmission of scales and so on.
Personally, I'm more into direct interaction with gear rather than
remote control via some other kit; the remote side is just another layer
of complication for my tiny, befuddled brain to cope with.
All good stuff.
Paul
--
---
Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music / Bogus Focus Records / Binar / Headshock / The Joint Intelligence Committee
www.softroom.co.uk / www.BogusFocus.com / www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com
** New JIC Live CD available at the BogusFocus site now!! **Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions
2006-02-11 by Paul Nagle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.