On 10 Mar 2006, at 14:41, ferrograph632 wrote: > so I've been using an emu command station, shoot me. I've had a command station for a few years. The sequencer is pretty basic, and not terribly interactive, and the whole tracks-vs-channels business is a bit of a mess. Having said that, I quite like the unit - the integration between sequencer and synthesis engine isn't bad, and the big front panel is nice if you don't dig too deep into the way the controls are mapped. Basically, it's a complicated synthesis engine with a "look-I'm-easy- to-use" front panel; the real problem is when the cracks show between the two paradigms. -- N. nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http:// www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] the alternatives suck
2006-03-10 by Nick Rothwell