> Just to be sure, is this the bug's that's done my cpu's in in P3's > #23&45 or was that something else? No, those were the older Temic parts. When they corrupt their flash, the lose chunks of the main program. That hasn't happened very often either, maybe 5 to 10 times out of 80 or so CPUs of that type. I had thought the Atmel parts were better, and I suppose they are in the sense that they only seem to lose a configuration byte rather than the program flash. But I'd much rather have CPUs with 100% flash reliability. We'll see how the Atmel parts work out with the updated bootloader. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Important Bootloader Update
2006-04-12 by Colin f