> I was just remembering that ages ago there was talk of a drum > machine version of the P3 > code. Has this ever come to fruition? Is it still planned? > > I also found the message below from Colin back in Jan 06. Are > these 'aux note ind' events > included in the new code? It's been a while since i've updated. 'Aux note ind' events are still on my TBI list. Architectural changes to the P3 code since I last thought about it would make them a lot easier to do, so thanks for reminding me... And I would really like a good percussion sequencer for my own use. But one thing that I thought was essential for a pairing of P3 and a drum sequencer would be to have some meaningful way of managing pattern storage across both units. At the moment I use my P3 with a 909, and it's a real pain trying to remember which drum patterns I've used with which bank on the P3 - I usually end up just using the same patterns too often. A percussion sequencer specifically designed to work with a P3 needs a 'matching' memory layout, ideally with remote sync of banks and so on, so that the two units would work as a whole. One of my intentions for the P3 replacement was to include percussion patterns natively, so a single box could do both jobs. But the P4 design process has got a bit bogged down. I have a target platform that could be awesomely powerful, but the development timescale is looking very long, and I started to worry that it will take me too long to ever actually get it finished - there's no money coming in while I'm not selling anything... So I've been working on something else - a re-worked version of P3. I've taken the final P3 OS as a starting point, and re-written large parts of it to eliminate things that I think are conceptually awkward, or limiting. It has no playlists, a fixed 16 bank memory structure, patterns up to 16 bars in length (editable with Electribe-style access to all bars) and dynamic allocation of pattern storage. This OS will most likely be released as an update for P3, but may also appear on a new product. The revised memory model in the new OS would also lend itself very well to a compatible percussion sequencer, so I will be looking into it... Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: New beta...
2007-04-01 by Colin Fraser
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.