> Is there any chance that the new OS will have a memory buffer > for a whole > bank rather than for an individual track? It might do, but it depends on how much code it would take to manage it. When you go into edit mode, however many bars are used by the pattern being edited are allocated to the edit buffer, and the original pattern copied into it. Edits are then performed on the data held in the edit buffer. When you exit edit mode, the edit buffer bars are copied back into the source pattern, or assigned to a different target pattern, or lost. In theory, there could be an undo buffer that tracked all changes to a bank since it was selected. But that would use a lot of storage. A simpler solution would be a bank copy option, that would let you copy a 'starting point' bank to another bank. Then you could make whatever edits you like, but still have the starting point to recall later. With 16 banks on hand, you'd have space for at least 4 bank copies before you had fewer banks to play with than on P3. It just depends on how many bars are allocated whether you'd have the space to do it. > From your description, this sounds like a fork of the existing P3 > OS. What would be the story regarding updates/fixes to the current OS? > > (I actually like playlists...) It is a fork of the current OS. Whether I continue to update the original OS much beyond it's current position will depend on how popular the revised version is. No-one else has used it yet, though it will be ready for limited beta testing soon. To a large extent, playlist functionality is replicated in the new OS. Each bar in a pattern will have tranpose, repeat and sync options, just like the steps in a playlist. You wont be able to re-use the same 'bar' at multiple points in one pattern, but to replicate a playlist where you have the same pattern on multiple steps, you would just need to copy the bar you want to repeat to other positions in the pattern. Storage space permitting, it will be possible to replicate any given P3 bank under the new OS. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: New beta...
2007-04-01 by Colin Fraser
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.