Analogue-sequencer

Well, one cool thing that I wanted Colin to implement ( and still want) is;

You do a sequence on the MAQ, then you can auto  expand/ contract  on the fly to 1 to 5 octaves

the only thing why I still keep mine.


Hans



________________________________> To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com> From: james@ticalun.net> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:55:12 -0500> Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] why P3>> I actually have all three and the P3 is the only way to go. The MAQ is now> quite old and is really lacking in several key features and not that usable.> It has problems with sync and limited CV options. I'm selling mine as it> really doesn't have a point now that I have a P3. I can't think of anything> the MAQ can do that the P3 doesn't. I am keeping my Schaltwerk because I> mainly use it to trigger events on my modular. For that, the is really> great. However, the Schaltwerk never was really finished, there are bugs> and holes in the software. The sync to MIDI is terrible. In fact, I am> actually using the P3 as a filter to cleanup the MIDI clock and outputting> the DIN sync to the Schaltwerk. Now it syncs perfectly.> James R. Coplin> _____> From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of seanzoega> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:04 AM> To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [analogue-sequencer] why P3> I am looking to purchase an analogue sequencer, and am wondering> between a doepfer MAQ/ doepfer schaltwerk and a p3. Is there anyone> out there who has used all three that can give me the benefit of their> experience> Thanks> Sean Zoega> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> 

_________________________________________________________________
¡Ya está aquí Windows Live Spaces! Ahora podrás crear fácilmente tu propio sitio Web.
http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx