colinfraser_com (03:52 pm 5/26/2003) wrote: >The final test PCB set is ordered. I've also requested a quote from >the PCB makers for the pre-ordered boards, so I will know the final >price in a few days. WAHOOOOOOOO! >I've updated the web page a bit - >http://www.colinfraser.com/p3/p3.htm > >There are a couple of PDF previews of different front panels for the >sequencer. I think I prefer the shape of Paul's desktop unit, but >it's not going to fit in a rack. Comments on whether people would >prefer a rack-mount or desktop unit are welcome ! I'd vote desktop... I'd hate to see the open feeling of the panel layout be sacrificed so that it can fit into a rack. Plus, from a tweaking perspective, the desktop rules for me. Any kind of panel space in a rack that's at good tweaking height is prime real estate, and there's just not a lot to go around. >These panels show the locations of the very late addition of >dedicated function select keys and LEDs for the step switches and >upper pots, which are the reason for the delay on the production >boards. These do make life simpler though... Dude... RIGHT ON! What a project man! WAHOOOOOOO!!!!! Mark
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Update
2003-05-27 by Mark Pulver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.