duncan wrote: > paul, what do you think? is this going to mess with y'r head too much? Messing with my head is what I do for fun. But actually I have had designs on the "track" knobs' default functions, leaving the existing mixer as is. I do find that amazingly handy. I'd love to see the track knobs doing accumulator abs setting - the top knob doing vel and D and the lower knob doing note accumulator. That would be an ace trick and if you assigned any track knob using an aux event it'd magically replace tat default behaviour. I'm not sure this one has impressed Colin yet though. :) > while we're at it- is there any way the controller values (7 & 11, I > think) could be editable? I like the volume control, but sometimes I'd > rather have a free controller instead of the pan in the midi mixer. > I'm the first one to admit that I was against this midi-control > surface use of the p3 way back when it first came up, but only idiots > refuse to change their minds or adapt.... :-) I know what you mean, I change my mind regularly. Or do I? Sorry. There are times I'd definitely sacrifice pan for mod wheel sure but I'm pretty darn happy with the mixer. Darn, darn happy. Love & peace & stuff -- Paul --- "Effectus super absolutionem" http://www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com http://www.myspace.com/jointintelligencecommittee
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: part-change holdover enhancement? & stuff
2008-02-23 by Softroom
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.