Wouldn’t it be even more efficient just use each bit for a chord type? Major, minor, augmented, diminished, etc. with some 4th, sixth, and sevenths, thrown in and just use the note value as the root? If you wanted to get fancy one of the other auxs could set the voicing/inversion. I have a hard time believing that we really need completely user configurable chords with the number of chord types you could easily pack into 7 bits. It seems really clunky to have to enter the chord data individually for each step. I guess when I’m composing with chords, I’m thinking in terms of the chord blocks themselves instead of the actual notes that make them up. But, that’s just me… James R. Coplin (郭杰明) *************************************** Work is the Curse of the Drinking Class *************************************** From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Colin Fraser Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 1:25 PM To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Chords on P3 - idea > if it's possible to have an aux event that works in tandem with the > FTS settings to produce /on a single aux/ a choice of minor & major > triads, then this- along with the other aux(es) set to play aux notes > as usual, ought to take care of most requirements. probably plenty. This is sort of what I was thinking of. Each aux has a 7 bit value range, so I was going to assign a particular interval to each bit. These might be minor third, major third, fourth, fifth, sixth, minor seventh, and major seventh. You'd be able to select any combination of those on top of the primary note. That would certainly be the most code efficient way to do it. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Chords on P3 - idea
2008-05-10 by James R. Coplin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.