--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle <softroom@...> wrote: > > --- duncan <ferrograph@...> wrote: > > > I think I'd still be stuck in v3 if it supported the > > mem-x, but v4 > > works for me now I've got my head round it. > > Probably me too - there are unique plusses for both > versions. V4 probably has the edge overall as it > allows you do to pattern "intros" - i.e. several bars > before the pattern's main loop kicks in. And LONG > patterns - cool (even if I never know where the hell > all the patterns are later, in what part etc.) > > :) > > V4 doesn't, however, give you the playlist equivalent > of having the same pattern transposed many times in > series; then you make one change to the pattern and it > is replicated across all others. Nor is there a fast > way to quickly reset all the transposes or repeats, > or, indeed, reorder bars with the speed, visibility > and elegance of playlists. > > Perhaps the biggest drawback for me is the loss of the > extra level of editing that playlists gave. I could go > into playlist edit, solo a single pattern by making a > one-step playlist, then go into the pattern and make > extensive edits. I could then exit up into playlist > edit and have another option to save (or not) the > playlist having independently tweaked a pattern or > patterns. I miss that a lot. > > If Colin had an infinite amount of time to give away > to us for free, I'd love the P3 to feature a "final" > MEMX version of v3 playlists with up to 16 patterns > per track, a playlist loop for intros (and outtros) > plus all the little extras that have gone in since v4 > but are not related to playlists/bars. If that > happened it would keep him occupied a while and for no > return. So personally, I will continue to watch for > any advances as I'm (very) ready for the next big > thing. > > Dunno if that helps or confuses. Par for the course. > > Paul > > --- > "Effectus super absolutionem" > http://www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com > http://www.myspace.com/jointintelligencecommittee > Hi Paul, I recently purchased a P3. I have been using the new OS for about a month now. I am hoping you can enlighten me on the relationship between parts with bars, and the part ordering and playback. I have set up one part with 8 tracks, all of which have 5 bars of music. When I play this part alone it works perfectly. It plays each bar in order with the number of repeats I set. Then I copy this part using the Page 3 function Copy Active from Part 1 to Part 2. If I play part 2 alone it also performs perfectly imitating the bar structure I copied. The problem arises when I select Part 1 and 2. I would expect that Part 1 would play all 5 bars, then move to Part2 and play all 5 bars. It does not. Instead it cycles through the first bar of each part. I am guessing I have to set some global parameters but I can not figure out what to do and I dont see anything in the release notes. Any help appreciated. John, P3 novice
Message
Re: Mem x and v4 os
2008-08-27 by strangerwillrobinson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.