Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: Mem x and v4 os

2008-08-27 by strangerwillrobinson

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle <softroom@...>
wrote:
>
> --- duncan <ferrograph@...> wrote:
> 
> > I think I'd still be stuck in v3 if it supported the
> > mem-x, but v4
> > works for me now I've got my head round it.
> 
> Probably me too - there are unique plusses for both
> versions. V4 probably has the edge overall as it
> allows you do to pattern "intros" - i.e. several bars
> before the pattern's main loop kicks in. And LONG
> patterns - cool (even if I never know where the hell
> all the patterns are later, in what part etc.) 
> 
> :)
> 
> V4 doesn't, however, give you the playlist equivalent
> of having the same pattern transposed many times in
> series; then you make one change to the pattern and it
> is replicated across all others. Nor is there a fast
> way to quickly reset all the transposes or repeats,
> or, indeed, reorder bars with the speed, visibility
> and elegance of playlists. 
> 
> Perhaps the biggest drawback for me is the loss of the
> extra level of editing that playlists gave. I could go
> into playlist edit, solo a single pattern by making a
> one-step playlist, then go into the pattern and make
> extensive edits. I could then exit up into playlist
> edit and have another option to save (or not) the
> playlist having independently tweaked a pattern or
> patterns. I miss that a lot.
> 
> If Colin had an infinite amount of time to give away
> to us for free, I'd love the P3 to feature a "final"
> MEMX version of v3 playlists with up to 16 patterns
> per track, a playlist loop for intros (and outtros)
> plus all the little extras that have gone in since v4
> but are not related to playlists/bars. If that
> happened it would keep him occupied a while and for no
> return. So personally, I will continue to watch for
> any advances as I'm (very) ready for the next big
> thing. 
> 
> Dunno if that helps or confuses. Par for the course.
> 
> Paul
> 
> ---
> "Effectus super absolutionem"
> http://www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com
> http://www.myspace.com/jointintelligencecommittee
>

Hi Paul,

I recently purchased a P3. I have been using the new OS for about a
month now. I am hoping you can enlighten me on the relationship
between parts with bars, and the part ordering and playback.

I have set up one part with 8 tracks, all of which have 5 bars of
music. When I play this part alone it works perfectly. It plays each
bar in order with the number of repeats I set. Then I copy this part
using the Page 3 function Copy Active from Part 1 to Part 2. If I play
part 2 alone it also performs perfectly imitating the bar structure I
copied.

The problem arises when I select Part 1 and 2. I would expect that
Part 1 would play all 5 bars, then move to Part2 and play all 5 bars.
It does not. Instead it cycles through the first bar of each part.

I am guessing I have to set some global parameters but I can not
figure out what to do and I dont see anything in the release notes.
Any help appreciated.

John, P3 novice

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.