Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: Doepfer MAQ 16/3 worths having it, having a P3?

2008-09-17 by duncan

hans- I have three maqs & two p3s. I still use one of the maqs & one
of the p3s together in our live rig, & (if I recall correctly) the
force-to-scale on midi-through events feature was added to the p3 at
my request, so that the maq would be processed into the same scale as
p3 events.
anyway- one of the great things about the maq is that it is
idiot-simple, & allows one to alter several step-events
simultaneously. you can change note values, for example, on several
channels at the same time. on the p3, this is harder to achieve &
somewhat less intuitive. this probably isn't a problem for most of us,
but my maqs are used by the drummer in my band. he is also
colour-blind, so using a p3 is not going to happen for him. :-)

but I'd sell the sq unless you are a serious collector (like me) or
else you subscribe the vince clarke's old view (now abandoned, it
seems), that "midi isn't tight enough".
I have an arp 1613 & a roland 104 that I like to muck about with
sometimes, & they do sound tighter than using a
maq/notron/octopus/zeit/schaltwerk/p3 via midi, but at the expense of
flexibility & complexity in one's arrangements. nothing's perfect!

duncan.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.