hans- I have three maqs & two p3s. I still use one of the maqs & one of the p3s together in our live rig, & (if I recall correctly) the force-to-scale on midi-through events feature was added to the p3 at my request, so that the maq would be processed into the same scale as p3 events. anyway- one of the great things about the maq is that it is idiot-simple, & allows one to alter several step-events simultaneously. you can change note values, for example, on several channels at the same time. on the p3, this is harder to achieve & somewhat less intuitive. this probably isn't a problem for most of us, but my maqs are used by the drummer in my band. he is also colour-blind, so using a p3 is not going to happen for him. :-) but I'd sell the sq unless you are a serious collector (like me) or else you subscribe the vince clarke's old view (now abandoned, it seems), that "midi isn't tight enough". I have an arp 1613 & a roland 104 that I like to muck about with sometimes, & they do sound tighter than using a maq/notron/octopus/zeit/schaltwerk/p3 via midi, but at the expense of flexibility & complexity in one's arrangements. nothing's perfect! duncan.
Message
Re: Doepfer MAQ 16/3 worths having it, having a P3?
2008-09-17 by duncan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.