Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Doepfer MAQ 16/3 worths having it, having a P3?

2008-09-17 by Zahir Manek

i use my maq with my modular because its handy having the midi to cv built in and the three rows. i use my p3 for midi stuff and pretty much everything else. in my opinion, you don't really need a MAQ if you have a p3. 

--- On Wed, 9/17/08, Jack Nabbits <bjm23@btinternet.com> wrote:

From: Jack Nabbits <bjm23@btinternet.com>
Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Doepfer MAQ 16/3 worths having it, having a P3?
To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 1:20 AM






I just arranged to buy a doepfer maq 16/3. I have a P3 and I am
wondering about the differences? Do you like the doepfer? How does it
compare to the P3?

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.